• Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fun fact: nearly 40% of all foodborne illnesses were caused by raw milk consumption. Pasteurization has reduced that number down to less than 1%, except in places where raw milk consumption is still allowed.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 days ago

      Been only buying organic milk for 10+ years now out of preference, it stays fresh for much longer than normal milk. This is because USDA Organic milk is ultra-pasteurized in almost the same way as shelf-stable milk.

      I searched and found this article and they reported that there’s virtually no difference in nutrients between the options:

      https://www.100daysofrealfood.com/is-ultra-pasteurized-milk-bad/

      So if all the nutrients are the same, the only difference in less pasteurization is more bacteria. Fuck that!

      • otterpop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think it definitely affects the taste though doesn’t it? I prefer the organic ones that are vat pasteurized due to that reason, ultra feels sweeter to me.

      • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Under certain conditions, and it still poses a risk as the proper labeling of it suggests.

        The NLH has some literature on the unnecessary amount of people that are made sick, and some that have died as a result of consuming raw milk.

        Take a look.

        If you want to believe it’s harmless, and consume it despite warnings, you are free to do so. But I can’t in good conscience allow you to misinform people without due diligence. Now everyone can weigh the risks after having been given both sides of the argument.

        • Jamablaya@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Already looked into it, it is harmless, unless you’re drinking week plus old shit been in a tanker. Fresh is key.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Unfortunately it’s not that simple. Avian flu and other viruses can potentially spread from cows to humans, where it’s more likely to mutate and spread. It’s never the risk-accepters that suffer most. It’s always the sick, the poor, the very young and the very old, and the healthcare workers who suffer. The people who refused to get vaccines or take even basic precautions with COVID killed a lot of people, while the vast majority of those assholes survived.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 days ago

        Avian flu and other viruses can potentially spread from cows to humans, where it’s more likely to mutate and spread.

        Every single person that contracts the HPAI H5N1 virus is a few billion chances for the virus to mutate and generate a strain that is able to spread from person to person. These people are throwing dice over and over and when they come up snake eyes, we are all going to lose.

        • naeap@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          But then the fault is obviously DEI, because it made the birds gay or something…

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        A coworker of mine (African American) lost three cousins to COVID. Minorities are less likely to have good healthcare or the resources to pay out of pocket when necessary. I’m mostly on team Darwin too but I agree it’s not just the idiots that will get hurt. The way things are going schools might even start teaching that raw milk isn’t that harmful.

    • cybersin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      And when more parents start giving their kids raw milk, what then?

      Forcing kids to eat dangerous food is child abuse.

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can anyone explain to me why conservatives love raw milk so much? Is it like more profitable or something? Why the hell does this keep coming up?

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 days ago

        Exactly. And we should exploit that by telling them it’s not safe to consume Arsenic or lick a lead bar multiple times a day, every day. They’ll be like, “oh yeah! watch me lib tard!”. And the population will shrink. :)

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          How about a glass of Hemlock juice? All those intellectuals and “city doctors” will try to get you away from that stuff, so it must be good!

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Hey, it turns out that lead acetate is a natural, calorie-free, sweetener! In fact, the ancient Romans used it. The FDA doesn’t want you to use this because they’re in bed with Big Sugar and the Splenda people.

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      7 days ago

      They’re like toddlers. You tell them they shouldn’t and they will do everything in their power to do it anyways. They don’t believe in science so everything is a “radical far left jewish space laser” conspiracy to take away their freedumbs.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 days ago

      As far as I can tell: It’s partially the same shit as the anti vaccine mixed with being angry about government regulations.

      A lot of the anecdotes I’ve heard about raw.milk being safe, are from small farms with few dairy cows.

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      In addition to what everyone else has said, I think it’s also from ideas of “return to tradition” and a veneration of a kind of rural lifestyle that largely doesn’t exist anymore. My extended family are farmers and even they got out of livestock when I was really young because there’s not enough profit except at obscene scale. But milk fresh from the cow was a thing I grew up hearing about from cousins, it was apparently viewed as safe enough for the older kids as long as you cleaned the teat and it was really really fresh. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the conditions in factory farms added another layer of risk that just wasn’t there in the 90s on the last remaining family farms.

      Edit: also some of them are operating under the mistaken idea that raw milk is healthier or more nutritious (it’s not), or that or tastes better (actually possible, I actually heard it tasted slightly better as a kid).

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Return to tradition is not the whole story.

        For conservatives, power is wielded or power is seceded. In a government that you don’t trust, that’s forcing you to drink pasteurized milk, the idea of raw milk is kind of that “the government is hiding something from us” and not “the government is protecting us”. While there is some overlap between “the government can’t be trusted with milk” with “the government can be trusted with immigrants”, for the most part they aren’t necessarily the same people but they are cut from the same cloth.

        They don’t want the government to control them. The government controls other people.

        It’s why people like RFK are so dangerous because he now has the power to remove many of the safety nets we have grown accustomed to. Instead of Trump’s first term where COVID was downplayed, we won’t even test for avian flu. We won’t even research cures.

        Not only that, given the sheer kowtowing media outlets are doing we likely will have challenges reading outbreaks in other countries.

        This is not an exaggeration. We are in fascism today.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        as long as you cleaned the teat and it was really really fresh. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the conditions in factory farms added another layer of risk that just wasn’t there in the 90s on the last remaining family farms.

        I think you’re hit the nail on the head. There’s a concept in engineering (Hyrum’s Law) that where systems interface with each other (e.g. software), the design of one will ultimately rely on every aspect of the other, intentional or otherwise. In the case of industrially produced milk, pasteurization permits a relatively high degree of filth on the supply side when compared to practices in the EU or UK (they ship more raw product). So, it stands to reason that this isn’t just likely but exactly what’s going on since everyone can get away with it.

      • dumples@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        When consuming raw milk directly from your own cow its a lot safer than anything related to shipping, holding and selling it. Raw milk always contains bacteria and other microbes. These take time to grow so drinking it immediately doesn’t give them time to grow. But any amount of time between that allows them to go crazy. So it can be safe to drink raw milk in the old method where it came directly from your own cow with no time between. Its anything with scale that causes all the issues.

    • HatFullOfSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      My mother’s been on the “natural health” train for a while now and claims that pasteurizing milk removes most of the nutrients (verifiably false). No amount of my protesting or pointing her towards sources for the contrary have convinced her to stop consuming that garbage.

    • Yodan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s anti vax and anti regulation so basically a maga wet dream. Squeeze cow, milk, ta da. In reality to the other 3/4 of humanity it’s a microbial breeding ground for unfiltered mutations and diseases because you’re just trusting the entire food chain leading up to the cow has been healthy and unmutated.

      Pasteurized milk goes through a process where you filter out unwanted microbes or unsafe mutations before bottling the milk. It’s like boiling water before drinking vs drinking from a puddle.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Pasteurized milk goes through a process where you filter out unwanted microbes or unsafe mutations before bottling the milk

        Not filtering. You heat the milk. And it’ll do nothing to “mutations.” It suppresses bacteria and at least some viruses. If you double-pasteurize, it’ll also suppress bacterial spores.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      If no one else has mentioned it, there are also those idiotic fascists (but I repeat myself) that were/are big on guzzling milk to show how “superior” they are because lactose intolerance is fairly common, but even more common among non-whites.

      Extra Nazi points if it’s raw milk, maybe?

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      The only half reasonable argument I’ve seen is that requiring pasteurisation (supposedly) makes it difficult for small dairy farms that want to sell direct to consumer, and forces them to sell to large milk companies for a far lower price. I have no idea how valid that argument is.

      • jagermo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I don’t think so. I remember that we bought milk directly from the farm as a kid (Germany, so experiences may vary), but it always got collected in a big container that automatically pasteurized it during storage. Every farm had those, so they couldn’t have been that expensive.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The conscription of the granola moms.

      I think it’s just that it’s a regulation, and regulation bad. I don’t want the gunment telling me I can’t drink raw milk. No, fools, the government doesn’t want people selling raw milk.

      A lot of the US understands capitalism as purchasing choices at the store. Therefore if I can buy more stuff at the store I’m more free. Regulation bad.

      This is handy for actual capitalist that want to abuse their workers and their customers by selling poison or watered down milk with plaster of Paris for color and liquified calf brains for texture miles from cows that are fed sawdust and literally dying. 👈 Why we regular milk now because this is all literally what was occuring.

      • LuckyPierre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Tuberculosis is also carried in unpastuerised milk. The US currently has the largest outbreak in its history.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Bird flu? Human-to-human either isn’t happening, or is extremely rare, can’t remember.

        For now. If it mutates to become more contagious without becoming less deadly, that becomes an everyone problem

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Dems don’t want you to drink raw milk. The micro doses of virus particles after passing through the cow’s immune system bolsters your body’s ability to fight those infections. Without that exposure, you need their vaccines and that creates a covert way to get their nanites into your blood stream. Bird flu is next on their list, so make sure to buy from areas where there is high infections in cattle!

  • CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Why do these fucking morons always want the objectively worst thing? The absolute dumbest thing you can think of and they’re all for it. Why is the world like this now? I can’t fucking stand it. “Let’s get rid of the FDA and OSHA!” Like, what the fuck is this horse shit. This shouldn’t be allowed to happen! I’m legitimately losing my sanity more and more each day.

    • _____@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      it’s because the government wants to fuck of us over duuude !! everything they say we should do opposite!! the government is a giant monolith and every human that works for them magically agrees to the same ideologies which force us to drink raw milk!! because they agreed pasteurized milk is good therefore it is bad !!

      that’s really all they think

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Conservatives Embrace Raw Milk

    Not seeing the problem, here.

    Regulators Say It’s Dangerous

    …And? We need a little chlorine in our gene pool. If the dumbest and most ignorant segment of America wants to kill themselves, it’s an adult making an adult’s decision. It can only improve society if they do.

    My only objection kicks in when kids end up in the cross hairs of that stupidity and ignorance.

  • dumples@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Cheese made from unpasteurized milk can be safe, its what happens in most of the world. As long as its done correctly, tested and labeled as such that is fine. The whole point of the cheesemaking process is to encourage the good microbes to outcompete with the bad ones to make the cheese since its a preservative method. Its the drinking of raw milk that is dangerous. So of course that is the part that everyone wants to do and fight about

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Cheese made from unpasteurized milk can be safe

      From what I know of the US food industry, I still wouldn’t chance it over there.

      • dumples@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Unpasteurized cheese will typically be higher end because it’s more difficult and slower to make. ( Unpasteurized cheese typically use the natural yeasts and bacterias to ferment so are slower). So as long as it labeled it should be fine

  • Methodical_Science@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This will almost certainly cause a rise in neonatal Listeria cases from maternal transmission…which even if the child survives, can leave them with lifelong disability and functional dependency. Through no fault of their own…just their parents.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Depending on your patience, you can make your own for super cheap. It’s roughly 100g oats to 1000g water, with 20-50g neutral oil, and a tiny bit of guar and xanthan gums. Blend the oats and water for a minute, strain, then add the gums and oil and blend again. Sweeten to taste. Maybe ten minutes max.

        If you can get it easily, adding amylase enzymes (blend of alpha, beta and gamma works best) after blending, warming to around 140, let sit for 30 minutes and then raise to 180 for 5 will increase the sweetness and keep it from getting gloopy. You can get them pretty cheap from a brewing supply store. It’s how they make commercial oat milk, and it’s how they can say “no added sugar” and still have it be sweet.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Pro tip for the MAGAs: raw milk tastes much better when the cows have brucellosis and TB.