That’s not nice

Why?

Why would it?

It doesn’t matter where its hosted

I really like the filibuster as a system, but only when its real, as in the senators have to talk the whole time. It makes it so they’re actually demonstrating their passion about a cause.

Idk, it almost just depresses me to look at it. Something about it feels like 2000s benign

I didn’t know heat until I went to Kuwait in summer

Time to do steganography to talk to my friends I guess

Sadly it seems like most of Europe and potentially other “western” countries will follow

The EU is trying to do this at an EU level (and has been for years). As well as an individual country level, Sweden seems likely to pass a similar law in 2026.

https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/european-police-chiefs-call-for-industry-and-governments-to-take-action-against-end-to-end-encryption-roll-out

https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/05/07/european-threat-to-end-to-end-encryption-would-invade-phones/

https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/26/signal_will_withdraw_from_sweden/

https://www.wired.com/story/europe-break-encryption-leaked-document-csa-law/

Yep lol

Well its the same reason any comments on any art style(like Ben Garrison’s)

I hate this art style almost as much as I hate Ben Garrison’s

https://www.theverge.com/policy/621848/uk-killing-encryption-e2e-apple-adp-privacy

IIRC there was actually a study and pedos with access to synthetic CSAM were less likely to victimize real children.

I agree no state has a right to exist

I agree, but did you say the same when racists endorsed Trump?

Yeah I agree there’s no time for primaries, I was just responding to that isolated statement- not saying its never useful.

Certain outsiders aside, Democrats are really good about getting their shit together behind closed doors.

I don’t believe that many voters like closed door conspiring

I don’t feel I could change the foods I like on a whim, that doesn’t mean there’s a biological component(for some dislikes there is though) to it. My boyfriend is gay and he admits he has no clue if he was born with it or not.

Within the scope of the law, things that are perceived to be choices within one’s control are more likely to be regulated. It’s harder to justify regulating those components of ourselves that we inherit.

I know this isn’t what you’re doing, but I feel some people use this as a justification to push something they know is unproven.