I know its a bit of a hot topic but I’ve always seen people (online anyways) are either a hard yes or absolutely no on using AI. There are many types of “AI” that have already been part of technology before this hype, I’m talking about LLMs specifically (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc…). When this bubble burst its absolutely not going anywhere. I’m wondering if there is case where you’ve personally used it and found it beneficial (not something you’ve read or seen somewhere). The ethics of essentially stealing vast amount of data for training without compensation or enshitification of products with “AI” is a whole other topic but there is absolutely no way that the use of the technology itself is not beneficial somehow. Like everything else divisive the truth is definitely somewhere in the middle. I’ve been using lumo from proton for the last three weeks and its not bad. I’ve personally found it useful in helping me troubleshoot issues, search or just use it to help with applying for jobs:

  • its very good at looking past SEO slop plaguing the internet and it just gets me the information I need. I’ve tried alternative search engine (mojeek, startpage, searXNG, DDG, Qwant, etc…) Most of them unfortunately aren’t very good or are just another way to use google or bing.
  • I was having some wifi problem on a pc i was setting up and i couldn’t figure out why. i told it exactly what was happening with my computer along with exact specs. It gave gave me some possible reasons and some steps to try and analyze my computer it was very very useful.
  • I’ve been applying for so many jobs and it so exhausting to read hundreds of description see one tiny thing in the middle that disqualifies me so I pass it my resume with links and tell it to compare what i say on my resume and what the job is looking for to see if im a fit. When i find a good job i ask rewriting tips to better focus on what will stand out to a recruiter (or an application filtering system to be real).

I guess what I’m trying to say is it cant all be bad.

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I’ve used it to help me set up a home server. I can paste text from log files or ask about something not working and it tells me what the problem is. It gets things wrong a lot, but this is the perfect low risk use for AI…for sending me in the right direction when I have no idea why things aren’t working. When it’s completely wrong, it doesn’t really matter.

    The real test for AI is: “does it matter when it is completely wrong”. If the answer is yes, then that’s not a suitable use for AI.

    • Eril@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      This. I’m a software engineer and I also sometimes use it by providing it a problem and asking it for ideas how to solve them (usually with the addition of “don’t write any code”, I do that myself, thanks). It gives me a few pointers that I can then follow. Sometimes it’s garbage, sometimes it’s quite good.

      • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        99% garbage.

        If you have ever touched C++ you will know that it has godawful errors and not even chatgpt knows what the fuck is happwning

        • Eril@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          That’s why I’m not asking it to give me actual code I should use, but keep it high level. If it then says there are patterns x,y and z that could be usable, I can look it up myself and also write the code itself. Using it to actually write the code is mostly garbage, yes. And in any case you still need to have an idea of what you’re doing yourself anyway.

          • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            No, I’m not asking it to write code, I’m asking it to interpret the error and point to the actual problem in the code. It just can’t…

  • aberrate_junior_beatnik (he/him)@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    It’s got lots of uses:

    • driving up fossil fuel revenues
    • providing a solid excuse for laying off a bunch of employees
    • disciplining labor
    • offloading blame for unpopular decisions
    • increasing surveillance and nonconsensual data collection
    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago
      • corporate theft from artists, claiming ‘its just learning data bro’, only to have the output often be 99% identical to the original ‘learning data’
      • making fake videos much easier for swift political disinformation campaigns
      • LLM voice agents that make scams much easier to perpetuate on the elderly
  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I self host Deepseek R1 and it’s been pretty helpful with simple Linux troubleshooting, generating bash commands, and even programming troubleshooting. The thinking feature is pretty cool and I do find myself learning stuff from it.

    What took it from gimmick to actual nice to have for me is when my jerry rigged home network broke and wouldn’t connect to the internet. Having what is entially an interactive StackOverflow/ServerFault running on a local machine was really helpful.

    Running the model locally makes it easier to not overly rely on AI because of the limited token rate.

  • comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 days ago

    Creating low-effort images for ideas that don’t warrant effort, like silly jokes.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 days ago

    I see it as a toy. No different from the Slinky or Silly Putty I had as a kid. Just something to play with.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    Solo roleplay. You can make a character and interact. Generate fake conversations etc.

    With generative images you can create custom backgrounds, portraits and landscapes instead of having to lookup for them or doing it yourself.

    You can also do some interactive story telling that it’s kind of fun.

    Generating quick test questions over a certain topic. It’s another use case I’ve seen it being quite good at.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    Regarding the job application, most companies and sites are using shitty AI to rummage through the piles of resumes they receive.

    The whole job application process is frankly one of the worst real world use of most technologies, not only AI

  • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 days ago

    Inspiration for writing emails, letters, text messages. I always check what the thing wrote though.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 days ago

    I don’t use it for writing code because that’s what I love but I use it for documentation and other stuff I hate…😂

  • josephc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    I used to spend days rotoscoping people in videos. Generative infill for background painting and automatic rotoscoping have saved probably a year of my life at this point. Image generation relies on CLIP, which needs a language model for conditioning.

  • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    You know those business books that combine flimsy pop psychology and self help literature with personal development and business goals? Yeah, those books with 300 pages and only one good idea per 100 pages if you’re lucky. Rest of it is just fabricated stories, ideas copied from other books and regurgitation of ideas from the previous chapters to fluff up the page count. Yes, that category!

    Well guess what? GPT can generate precisely that level of quality without any effort. In fact, it seems to gravitate towards that style unless you specifically work hard to steer it to aim higher. It has never been easier to become a business book author! Zero editing required. Just prompt and publish.

    It feels like this is the one area where GPT truly excels.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    It’s good for rapid output of plausibly human text that can then be sorted or assessed for adequate validity or utility. That’s all.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    For engineering… Get me a script that calculates the length of a window based on a similar size. Or calculate the tip velocity of a turbine blade given the speed of the gas going into it and the diameter of the turbine. Basically things we would have to take a month to design so as to answer other questions. Cuz nobody pays you to make quick calculation tools.

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        No, you don’t just get a script and run it blindly! You use your knuckle to figure out if it works first by reading the code and calculating known data as a test.

        You can’t even rely on AI to have real formulas for the area of a circle. You have to rely on your own knowledge and on books to confirm if the code is doing what you need it to do.

        What AI does is it shortens the code creation time to just a few seconds vs days of coding… Because engineers are the best back seat coders I know. Once there’s good code they can move mountains. But confronted with a blank page they freeze.

        • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Most if the time is spent fixing AI code, and writing prompts. I don’t think you save any time.

          Also have fun in integration and deduplication hell.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      This doesn’t sound like the hardest thing to write a program for especially if you have the gibbity help you write it and quadruple check its output.