• BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    In a sane world this would earn you a dunce hat. In this one it will earn you a position in the gubmint.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i mean, if the moon is up there, the light first has to bounce off of the moon, and then back to earth, so yes, it would most definitely take longer…

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      the light first has to bounce off of the moon, and then back to earth

      That’s a second, more or less.

  • jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    But not by much longer. People on the other side of the world or connected to satellites monitoring sunspots would notice pretty much immediately after the light ceases to reach the earth and would tell everyone else over the internet

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      14 hours ago

      And even if you’re not connected at the moment, the moon will go dark.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Good one! If the moon wasn’t visible at the time and you were just sitting outside say at midnight, I wonder if you would notice anything different.

        • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It would turn pitch black. So dark the stars far away would be the brightest when compared to everything else. It would be scary.

          • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            According to astronomers the sun doesn’t have a measurable effect on the night sky when it’s more than 18 degrees below the horizon. So I doubt naked-eye observers would notice.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Ok, first thing, did you not understand the image is a joke? Secondly, you have failed so badly at trying to use logic. And you’d notice it everywhere on the earth, both because of the moon and also just light scattering, it would become darker than ever before. And as said, most people would be asleep on the dark side, which is obvious. And it’s not like the astronomers etc. have some kind of worldwide siren to get everyone’s attention, most people wouldn’t notice it for a while, even if they posted about it online.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    18 hours ago

    And now for the segue into a shower thought - so the first thing night side would notice is the Moon disappearing (if it’s in the night sky), but after that, how long before effects begin to suggest something is seriously wrong on the day side. Something tells me it will be sooner than the morning.

      • Machinist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        My guess is that bacteria down in the crust near thermal vents would live the longest. Thousnands of years if they are able to follow the heat down.

        Figure bunkered people might make it a few months depending on their power source and ability to withstand dropping pressure. Not sure how long it would take for the atmosphere to freeze. Government bunker that is vacuum proof with a reactor might make it a decade.

    • TaTTe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’d assume after 8 minutes the people on the day side would notice and all media would blow up, so hopefully you’d be asleep and wouldn’t have to worry :)

      • RandomVideos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        But all the solar panels will stop working so there will be no electricity. Batteries would run out and any other source of energy would be destroyed by people who started a cult worshipping the Sun hoping it would reappear

        So no social media on the part of the Earth that would notice the disappearance of the sun. The other side wouldnt have any problems with electricity since they wouldnt have the Sun-worshipping cult

  • burgersc12@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Wouldn’t the planet rapidly start to cool? I think we’d be dead by morning

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The core is still hot. If we bury ourselves deep underground, there is a chance the humanity could survive for thousands of years without a sun. If not humanity, then some sort of life will survive long enough for future archeologists to find it millions of years later.

      But don’t quite me on this; I’m simply reciting from memory something I read in National Geographic or a similar publication 10-20 years ago. IDK how true this actually is.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        We would need enough advance notice to prepare for massively farming mushrooms or something underground to eat. Canned food will run out in a few years, even military MREs have a shelf life. A few lucky people might survive a generation, but there’s a minimal breeding stock requirement to avoid degeneration from inbreeding. Extremely long odds, I think the human race would only survive this event in a sci-fi fantasy story.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Wherever you live on the Earth’s surface starts cooling every night and gets warmed up again the next day. It wouldn’t cool any faster if the sun went away, it would just keep cooling at the normal rate until everything was frozen. But I doubt it would take more than a week or two, depending on where you live.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, but that’s with petawatts being blasted on the other side of the earth every second, wouldn’t the loss of that make the whole system cool down faster, including the side the sun doesn’t touch? I’m thinking it’d be like having food on a hot plate, bottom is very hot, the top is less hot. But if you take the food off the plate the whole thing rapidly goes to room temp. I honestly have no idea, just conjecture tbh.

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Atmosphere would hold the heat for a bit, the real issues will begin with food shortages because the crops won’t grow

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah but how long is a bit? Also, without the gravity center of our solar system, how long would it take for all the planets to start drifting off into the void?

        • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          14 hours ago

          A bit - probably weeks to months. For the second question - 8 minutes for the Earth, since gravity propagates at the speed of light

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Expanding a little on the last part, Earth’s orbital velocity is about 29.8 km/s so that’s the speed at which we would suddenly be leaving the former location of the solar system in a direction that depends on what time of year it happened. Regardless of direction though, the escape velocity of the Milky Way around where we are is about 544 km/s so there’s no way we’d be leaving the galaxy. On the other hand the plane of the galaxy is only about 6 degrees off from the galactic center at the moment, so if this happened at the right time of year (don’t know when that is) we could launch somewhat towards the core. We would not however get very close to it because the sun’s own orbital velocity is about 230 km/s so we’d still be in close to the same galactic orbit overall, just potentially a bit more eccentric.

            • burgersc12@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Do you think Jupiter would take over as our center of the solar system? Hopefully it doesn’t sling us into deep space or another planet

              • Klear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                50 minutes ago

                I wouldn’t sling us into deep space because we are in deep space and will continue to be in deep space.

          • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            A bit - probably weeks to months.

            no lol
            It goes from 85 to 58 in 12 hours right now in reality world

            “A bit” = 1 day, and by the end of that day it’d be freezing (below freezing if you live in whiteistan)

    • philthi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Doesn’t the earth itself provide a significant amount of heat from the core? I’m sure I read somewhere that for something like every 10 meters down you dig, the temperature raises by 1° celcius. So maybe we’d not notice a temperature drop so quickly?

      • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The surface would eventually freeze over. But some life would almost definitely survive deep underground and underwater, near geothermal vents not unlike those that hosted the first lifeforms on Earth. And, maybe, in some billions or trillions of years, Earth would stray near another star system, get captured by its gravity and slowly thaw out, restarting the evolution of life.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Would hydrothermal vents produce enough heat? Or would the oceans freeze over? And then would there just be thermal bubbles surrounding the vents in oceanic ice?

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Not sure how quick exactly, but the earth doesn’t provide enough heat, not even close. Kurzgesagt has a video on a similar subject, without the trillions 1.7e17 Watts showering the earth every second we’d get awfully cold awfully quick. They are talking about slowly moving away from the sun, but they conclude it would get real icy

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The moon also doesn’t emit it’s own light. It would take longer for the moon to “disappear” than it would for the sun but it wouldn’t be the whole night.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The moon is just a few light-seconds away from earth; that’s why they could have conversations with ground control during the moon landings. Moon will go dark a few seconds after the sun.

      • philthi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I agree with you, but also… I’m not sure that I’d notice that I could see the moon a few minutes ago and now I can’t (unless I happened to be looking at it as it happened)… I feel like that is something that could be happening every single night and I’ve never noticed.

        The sun disappearing is like… Super noticeable by comparison.

          • philthi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Maybe if I lived in the countryside, here in a city, I only really notice the moon if I’m looking for it (which I do often, I love seeing our moon).

            • potustheplant@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              35 minutes ago

              I live in the city and the moonlight is clearly noticeable so I guess it depends. I mean, a city can be considered as such with as little as 50k people so I guess that, statistically, the majority of people that live in a city would most certainly notice the lack of moonlight.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This is the cutting-edge of my understanding so if I’m wrong somebody call me out, but I think because gravity is warping space-time and not actually pulling anything, we wouldn’t feel an inertia change. Our inertia would be maintained, but the space-time we’re going through would suddenly be shaped different, so we’d follow a new path

      • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The part you’re missing is that earth isn’t a point in space. That’s why there’s tides caused by the sun (which are different than tides caused by the moon)

        A person wouldn’t feel the difference, but the tides would slosh back when the solar gravity stops effecting them.

      • Etterra@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So would all the other planets, so there’d be a non-zero chance we’d smack into one of them. Most likely though we’d become a very, very cold rogue planet.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I know gravity moves at the speed of light. I’m just referring to the slight pull of the gravity and the sudden shift to traveling straight off instead of a circle.

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          All of that will only happen after 8 minutes, see this comment.

          Earth has a circular orbit because space-time is curved by the mass of the sun. (Think of a large bowling ball on a trampoline, you can make a small ball travel in circles around it, and if there was no friction, it would go on indefinitely.) When the sun’s mass suddenly disappears (by pure magic, as this would violate many laws of physics), spacetime would flatten out, at the speed of light.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I really doubt we would notice, because if so we would already be feeling different during day and night. The sun pulls us toward the sky during the daytime and toward the ground at night. Also toward the east at sunrise and the west at sunset. But none of this seems noticeable.

      • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        We are in “free fall” around the Sun so that’s why we don’t feel its pull of gravity.

        You would similarly feel weightless if you were in an orbit around Earth.

  • Narauko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The real question is if the earth becomes a rogue planet or if Jupiter captures most/all of the remaining solar system. Jupiter is technically a failed star, so could it finally get it’s glowup from being the sun’s understudy and keep us all together until we fall into the gravitational well of a new star?

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      If the sun just disappears, I doubt even having another sun would keep everything from flying off to fuck knows where. Jupiter, by comparison, is beyond hope. The Barycenter is far from Jupiter.

  • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I wonder if we would feel the sudden disappearance of the centripetal force of the sun’s gravity.

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          The speed of light is more than just the speed of light. Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Not particles, not gravitational waves (waves and particles are actually kinda equivalent anyway), not any kind of “information”.

          Consequently, if two events occur in a way that a particle would have to travel faster than the speed of light to travel between them, then it’s impossible for one of those events to be caused by the other. They must be unrelated. So the soonest we will see any effect of the sun blipping out of existence, whatever the medium (light/gravity/??), is after 8 minutes.

            • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Interestingly it’s not, but the thing is that you can’t actually use quantum entanglement to send information from one particle to the other, so it does not violate the principles of special relativity.

              So usually this is explained with two scientists, Alice and Bob, on far away planets. They’re each in the possession of a particle that is entangled with the other, and in a superposition of state 1 and state 2. When Alice measures the state of her particle, it collapses into one of the states, say state 1. When Bob measures the state of his particle immediately after, before any particle travelling at light speed could get there, it will also be in state 1 (assuming they were entangled in such a way that the state will be the same).

              Due to special relativity, for some observers it could actually have been Bob who measured the state of his particle first, before Alice did. In the end, it doesn’t really matter. They both got the same information: “state 1”, but since they can’t control what state the particle will collapse to, no information can be exchanged between Alice and Bob.

              In quantum encryption, it is that bit of shared information that Alice and Bob can use as a key to encrypt and decrypt messages, but those messages are still sent the old fashioned way, using light waves traveling at light speed.

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Changes in the gravitational field definitely travel, and do so at the speed of light.

            Look up LIGO

            • cuerdo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              If the mass vanishes, then the gravity would also vanish, at the same time.

              • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                14 hours ago

                False. If the mass vanished via magic, the effect would ripple out at the speed of light. Source, gravity waves which move at the speed of light.

              • cuerdo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                But vanishing is magic, it goes against the laws of physics, so you could apply any fictional logic

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Gravity isn’t a force, strictly speaking. Objects move along geodesics in spacetime (that’s basically a straight line along a curved surface), and gravity bends spacetime, and therefore also these geodesics, around massive objects. So you don’t actually get accelerated by gravity, that’s why you don’t feel anything during free fall. What we perceive as the force of gravity pushing us down, is the solid ground accelerating us upwards, when following the geodesic would have us fall instead.

      So when the sun disappears, the geodesic that used to spiral around the sun suddenly straightens out, and the neutral movement, the new free fall, has the earth continuing in a straight line. You wouldn’t be able to feel that. What the other person said about tidal forces is true tho, it would likely cause worldwide tsunamis

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If it happens at night it will probably take 5 or 6 seconds longer for people to start seeing the first messages on the internet