You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
Actually one of the reasons I like misskey derivatives and their diversity.
Whan that Aprill with his shoures soote
If the sun just disappears, I doubt even having another sun would keep everything from flying off to fuck knows where. Jupiter, by comparison, is beyond hope. The Barycenter is far from Jupiter.
It’s pretty basic to understand why what you’re looking for doesn’t exist. Every instance that has rules for it’s own users will defederate from an instance that prides itself on breaking those rules. So you’re not going to find an instance that allows you to break the rules that most of the community agrees with while also being federated with everybody. You’d essentially have to create an entire alternate network.
Unhesitatingly
Lemmy has a long way to go before eternal September to be sure. It’s once people don’t know individual commenters across the entire platform we might get there, but as is the regular users are unlikely to get drowned out anytime soon.
Shoot the seals. The seals eat all the fish.
Assyria did it before the Romans. They had a general resettlement policy that moved people into mesopotamia. Unless you were talking about Assyria and the Romans as the two.
Correct. But it’s often used for specific cis people when you are trying to create a detached or dismissive tone about those cis people. That’s what the poster was doing. They were being very ambivlant and detached about Page’s motivations and abilities. It’s sensitive because in both cases it’s being used to distance yourself from their identity. “I don’t care what he thinks” is less dismissive and more confrontational than “I don’t care what they think.” See similarly “they can do what they want” used when the gender is known, implying you’ve washed your hands completely of a person.
Using they conveys a detached tone which matches the detached and ambivalent nature of the comment. See similarly “I don’t care what they think” or “I don’t know why they act that way” which would normally be used in informal conversation to signify a lack of engagement with the subject.
Yeah but you’ll get vitamin B1 deficiency if you go on this diet.
Fuckcars aren’t out to spare EVs over ICEs.
Division is the key but affordability wasn’t why. Everything agricultural was counted by the dozen, gross, and great gross.
Yeah it’s just the Catholics, with their belief in universal authority of the Pope, actually still embody that original etymology. And if there’s one group that gets hung up on the original meaning of words in other languages it’s theologians. Well, at least non evangelical theologians. Evangelicals like to invent meaning and declare the king James bible divinely inspired so who knows what’s going through their minds half the time.
They’re a liberal. They give the gun but sell the bullets.
Well they could count 6 knuckles on each hand, with one hand representing the dozens place.
Anglican Catholic Church
The church part of the name isn’t what really gets me. How can a schisim(from the episcopalians) of an offshoot(from the church of England) of a schisim(from the Catholic Church) proclaim itself katholikos (universal).
Duodecimal is objectively better and that’s why commoners used it.
It’s a basic symptom of the social contract falling apart. Arguing that in reality everybody who didn’t vote is happy with the outcome is a fine way to argue yourself into not understanding the real state of the country and what options there are for resistance. An actual mandate vs the teetering corpse of a failed democracy are two very different things.