

I’m a cis straight guy and I find trans women and trans men attractive… maybe I’m not so straight…
I’m a cis straight guy and I find trans women and trans men attractive… maybe I’m not so straight…
You fucking loser, it’s not fucking proof, you mouth breathing idiot- that’s what the LAWSUIT IS FOR—- THE TRIAL WILL DECIDE IF THE PROOF IS REAL. how fucking dumb are you, it’s like honestly you’re attacking ME? Gtfo of here you might as well be sucking Charlie Kirk’s dick
Fuck off, nazi
If you actually read the article, the goal of the lawsuit is not to overturn the results of the 2024 election, cause democrats aren’t like you. The goal of the lawsuit, limited to one county in NY state, is to uncover what irregularities there were in the tallying of votes in that one county in NY, cause if it’s as bad as the lawsuit alleges, then the voting machines themselves were tampered with. But you don’t care about that as long as the cheaters are on your side of the aisle
So you don’t care about the integrity of our elections then. Good to know.
“Election analysts have pointed to statistical anomalies that emerged in Democratic-leaning areas. In several precincts, reports suggest Kamala Harris’s name may have been missing from the top of the ballot, while other Democratic candidates received strong support. Some districts reportedly recorded zero votes for Harris, despite voter turnout favoring Democrats in other races.
In contrast, Donald Trump’s vote totals reportedly exceeded those of Republican Senate candidates by hundreds of thousands of votes in certain counties. Experts have noted that such a discrepancy is highly unusual, as presidential and Senate candidates typically perform within similar margins, particularly in partisan strongholds.”
Well almost zero of Trumps 2020 election lawsuits met even the low bar of proceeding to discovery, and were dismissed outright, including 30 lawsuits that were dismissed after a hearing on the merits. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election) So when you said, “presented before a judge” I took you at your word. What you should have said was “proceeded to trial” because that’s when you do all the swearing in. Or depositions- but that’s part of discovery, which this suit about the 2024 election is already in, so technically if there are any depositions taken, people are already swearing oath right now. So I guess by either definition this trial is one to take seriously.
1000% agree, paper ballots only, no more electronic tallying.
This was presented before a judge, in the NY Supreme Court, and it has proceeded to discovery, as allowed by the judge
https://www.newsweek.com/2024-election-lawsuit-advances-2083391
The lawsuits in 2020 were filed by Trump and were baseless, this is why they were thrown out.
The lawsuit in the link above (I’ll explain it to you cause you don’t seem like a “reader”) has been allowed to proceed to discovery by the NY Supreme Court. Discovery is a neat part of a lawsuit where people gather and present cool things called “evidence”
“CHARLIE KIRK IS LITERALLY JESUS CHRIST”
This guy gets it
Edit, I was being sarcastic
There are several lawsuits that allege massive discrepancies in down ballot races in counties all over the USA
Twitter is just for nazis now, 2020 was NOT rigged but 2024 sure as fuck was
My take is that since the public just wholesale bought the story about the UHC CEOs murderer engraving 9mm bullets, someone at WSJ (owned by Rupert/Lachlan Murdock, known Nazis and accelerationists) decided “hey let’s tell everyone these bullets had engravings too” and intentionally left the “messages” on the bullets vague enough to go either way. Once it was out there, people ran with it cause it sounded plausible.
“If we stop saying it maybe they’ll go away”