I was going to make a post on unpopular opinions saying comic sans is not as bad as people make it out to be and can be useful in some cases since it is easier to read. But decided not to because I wasnt sure kbin/lemmy felt about it.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hating comic sans is a meme. It was overused and thus received backlash, and now the backlash has been going on longer that the trend it was in response to.

  • aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s acceptable in the following contexts:

    • In a comic
    • In content designed for children

    That’s pretty much it.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      No no no no.

      It’s also acceptable for presidential speeches. The funny letters have a way of calming the elderly.

          • aleph@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            According to research, the space between letters is more important for people with reading disabilities than rotational distinction.

            Typefaces may affect web accessibility, but if you want to provide a better experience for readers, Comic Sans isn’t the only option. The best practice is to use a widely available font with no extra decorations or flourishes.

            In addition to Comic Sans, the British Dyslexia Association recommends Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, Century Gothic, Trebuchet, Calibri, and Open Sans.

            https://www.boia.org/blog/does-comic-sans-benefit-people-with-dyslexia

  • JWBananas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    The monospaced version is the best terminal font I’ve ever used. I can find information on the screen way faster.

  • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I very much associate it with the kind of person in the corporate environment who says things like “does somebody have a case of the Mondays?”

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Have you ever read really dense technical material in comic sans? It’s awesome, I recommend it

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    There was a time when it was overused. That’s not the case anymore.

    I would still be triggered when I see it, but I don’t think the hate is needed anymore.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think that it’s a pretty decent typeface – it looks decent and successfully evokes comic book text. But because Microsoft bundled it with its OS, where it was one of the few distinct-looking typefaces, it became overused, got put in a lot of material where it wasn’t really a great choice.

    But I won’t blame the typeface for people using it in inappropriate spots.

    I used to have a number of typefaces used for various things, but I kind of stopped messing around with decorative fonts once I wanted wide Unicode support.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s not easier to read, I’m not sure where that myth came from. There’s fonts specifically designed to be easier to read for dyslexics and they look nothing like comic sans.

    Some people just want to make excuses for their questionable typographical decisions I guess.