• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would argue that most people never need lossless, because most people don’t use speakers/headphones with high enough fidelity to produce any acoustic difference to a high-bitrate MP3 in the first place.

    I used to work with a guy who swore by his FLAC collection, and would listen to it through some $40 Skullcandy earphones. I never understood why.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      A family member is an audio engineer (now also a producer) who owns a good recording studio, and we’ve A/B tested lossy vs lossless on good equipment. He hears things that I don’t, my ear is somewhat untrained. But at mp3 bitrates below 320, I can hear compression artifacts, especially in percussion instruments and acoustic guitar. But if you’re listening in your car or while wearing Bluetooth earbuds while you’re out walking, you probably won’t notice unless the mp3 bitrate is really dismal.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Are you sure? From everything I’ve heard MP3 bitrates at 192 or above are generally considered to be transparent.

        In case you want to do it more scientifically, try ABX testing. It’s a bit time consuming but it should provide clearer results.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Not OP, but I promise you that I can hear what sounds like digital water being thrown over the cymbals when listening to mp3 files below 320 kbps. Even then, every now and then I hear that sound here and there across whatever record I’m listening to.

          I don’t experience it when listening to records, CDs, or cassettes.

          My hearing used to be very sensitive. When the whole world was using CRTs, I could tell you who had their tv on just standing outside their house.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      1 day ago

      The main benefit to lossless is for archival purposes. I can transcode to any format (such as on mobile) without generational quality loss.

      And it means if a better lossy format comes out in the future, I can use that without issue.

    • GargleBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A teacher in my highschool (~16 years ago) “demonstrated” that lossless and mp3 are indistinguishable by playing the same song in different formats… On 10€ pc speakers

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That sounds like conclusive proof that sound quality is determined by the shittiest component in the signal chain.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Well they have the skulls on them. They must be good! People wouldn’t have died for them otherwise! Duh!!!

    • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If you are using the files played back at different tempos or keyshifted, the difference between lossy and lossless is a lot more apparent. For standard playback at normal pitch, mp3 is just fine.