• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    This what we would call false advertising in my country.

    You can’t write: “NO ADS!*”

    “*actually, maybe some ads, as a treat”

    That’s just completely negating the headline claim

  • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good thing I pirate all their shit already if I want it.

    I stopped paying for Amazon Prime over a year ago once they announced similar bullshit with their video service.

    Once Disney dropped subscription sharing… I started downloading their shit too.

    Now i’m left with Netflix and Crunchyroll. I’m this close to axing netflix. Crunchyroll is kinda shit but at least it’s cheap.

      • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the point of what they’re saying. If you’re only buying a subscription to the content then it’s not theft to get access to that content by other means.

        • MrGeekman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you’re going to hang onto the files for the foreseeable future, there is a big difference. Streaming services only grang you access as long as you pay. You rent access from them. Just because you subscribe to Hulu doesn’t mean you own anything. iTunes is a different story.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          the point is that it’s incorrect

          You aren’t buying it so the rest of the sentence is irrelevant

          Like stealing from blockbuster because you can rent it vs the video bin at the department store

          Nothing wrong with piracy without being dishonest about it

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ok, commercials on no add streaming services are akin to renting a beach house all for your fam but the landlord shows up and takes a giant dump in the only bathroom available

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ads free but with ads ! So words included in a contract don’t carry the same meaning as in the dictionary ?

    • SeekPie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’ve been using RD + Stremio for 2 years now, has worked great (except when RD shut down, then switched to Debrid-Link, which was as easy as RD). It costs about 3€ per month, though I think it has been worth it.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pirate your shows. Not just as a defense against ads, but as a defense against Disney throwing plotlines down the Memory Hole

    • Merlin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is what I do:

      1. Buy a perpetual license to the content I want (usually on Prime or Microsoft Store)
      2. Pirate it and load it onto my PLEX server.

      This is the only way I can actually have control over the content that I fucking paid for. If that makes me a thief, then so be it.

      Of course, this only works for PPV content. I generally just don’t watch content that’s available via streaming subscriptions only. I never paid for cable and I’m not paying for cable 2.0.

  • JiveTurkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    4 days ago

    If people would just drop their service en masse they would stop doing this shit. Everyone acts like they can be without a streaming service for a month or two so they’ll just complain as they continue to hand them money.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      In other areas, yeah, probably.

      But with music, movies, and TV, they’ll just blame piracy, crank up the DRM and bullshit on their own platforms, pat themselves on the back, and raise prices.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m interested to know if Hulu is under pressure from content owners here. The way this is worded makes it sound like ads are a negotiated part of some of their content licensing deals that they cannot avoid. I’m just curious if that’s in part because of the content owners. Maybe those owners don’t want to give content for a flat fee and instead want a % cut of the business, or something?

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The reality is there aren’t enough people that care about ads to do that.

      You either grew up with TV commercials or you grew up with ads, the conditioning is already there. There is a narrow band of people who don’t watch much or any TV and got on the internet for most content that remember when ads weren’t a thing. They have done studies and reviewed user data to determine how much ads they can play.

      They might push users to leave by tickling the ad tolerance while increasing subscription fees, but that is unlikely to happen as the frog is already boiled.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        4 days ago

        I grew up with ads but I still don’t tolerate them, I’m practically allergic to ads.

        Even back then I would just switch the Chanel when ads would start and then so many times just forget what I was watching and watch something else. And even as a kid I already would preference shows running on the public television in Germany because they didn’t have ads, they were played in a different way.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        People who grew up with ads were okay with it because the shows and movies were free.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I’m from Australia so maybe things were different there, but my parents had cable in the 1990s and 2000s and I don’t remember there being ads back then other than promotions for different shows on the same channel. I haven’t used cable since maybe 2006 so it’s definitely possible it’s changed since then.

            I know the US cable channels have a lot of ads these days, but I moved to the USA in 2013 and don’t have experience of how it was like before then.

            The antenna days are still here. I’ve got a HDHomeRun and use it with TiviMate and Plex. It’s great for local news/shows and gameshows. I find new restaurants through local shows that review restaurants for example.

            • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              There were ads on cable channels as far back as I remember. We got cable in '85 or '86. HBO didn’t have ads during the program, but every other channel sure did.

              • snooggums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                HBO had ads for the other content on HBO (movie trailers, show ads) which also served as filler so the next show or movie could start on the hour or half hour. Definitely a different kind of ad, and it didn’t interrupt what you were watching.

                Still ads, but the least intrusive kind.

    • Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I cancelled everything but paramount recently. Just cant quit star trek. Until I fix my DNS server at least

  • Merlin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Welp, just canceled that subscription. They can fuck right off.

  • Carl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    There’s no way that they should be allowed to advertise “no ads” when there are in fact ads. This is consumer protection so basic and obvious that it should be a slam dunk even with the current government… right?

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s no way this should be a profitable course of action. If I was paying for no Ads and started getting Ads I would immediately cancel my subscription and go somewhere else.

      Unfortunately too many people are good little consumers who just don’t care and it doesn’t even occur to them to stop paying and demand better.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    If the no ads and ads free version contains adds then pirating is also not immoral anymore.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Call it what it is - copyright infringement. Piracy is the act of robbery on the high seas, but we’ve allowed media companies to take a shit in our vocabularies so we can’t call things by their proper names.

      • casmael@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        Grog no like ad. Grog want buy thing? Grog make up own mind. Grog not want ad tell grog what buy, what like. Grog know what grog like.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Writing on the phone … sometimes I should proof read it. What i wanted to write was something like

        If the “no ads” and “ads free” version contains ads, then pirating the TV shows/movies is not immoral either.

        • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think they are pointing out that saying “no ads” and "ad-free about stuff that has ads is not using the words correctly. Could be wrong.