Deebster@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRule 84, etclemmy.mlimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down10
arrow-up169arrow-down1imageRule 84, etclemmy.mlDeebster@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squaremerde alors@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 year agoall digits can be created by using only one numeral : 8
minus-squareBeeko🐈@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoOnly with a rectangular 8. Doesn’t work for a ‘real’ 8. This solves that issue.
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoExcept you have to turn the thing on its head for some numbers which I consider a worse tradeoff.
minus-squaremerde alors@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year agowatch the video linked in another comment. There are circle based 7 segment displays, if you realy need those curves. i can see from how you did ‘real’ that 8, that i don’t need to remind you that there are no real 🖐️✌️🖕 :) ٨ VIII ⠦ 𐄎 𐄗 𐄠 𐄲 η ፰ ৮ 八 ८ ೮ ൮ ౮ ௮ ח ៨ ๘ Ը ը
minus-squareatocci@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI found myself down a YouTube rabbit hole once of people one-upping each other by making segmented displays with fewer and fewer segments and seeing who could use the least and still have it be decipherable for all numbers
all digits can be created by using only one numeral : 8
Only with a rectangular 8. Doesn’t work for a ‘real’ 8. This solves that issue.
Except you have to turn the thing on its head for some numbers which I consider a worse tradeoff.
watch the video linked in another comment. There are circle based 7 segment displays, if you realy need those curves.
i can see from how you did ‘real’ that 8, that i don’t need to remind you that there are no real 🖐️✌️🖕 :)
I found myself down a YouTube rabbit hole once of people one-upping each other by making segmented displays with fewer and fewer segments and seeing who could use the least and still have it be decipherable for all numbers