Correct, I’m not. I’ve been bluntly honest and fairly specific the whole time. Do you not know what bad faith means? It wouldn’t surprise me, when you think endlessly bickering with sea-lions is the only the appropriate response, and anything less must be proving them right.
There’s people whose behavior I’ve long since written off as consistently irrational, infuriating, and worst of all, shielded by their equally shitty moderators and admins. Why the fuck would I want to hash it out with them, for your amusement?
Not my amusement at all, I don’t really care too much. It’s just kinda weird that you talk about people and then when they are invited to the same soap box it’s fowl play to you.
Also more strawmen from you about me isn’t helping your case. You can’t build an argument from an army of them.
Are you saying they’ve professed those beliefs, but elsewhere and I should believe you even though you won’t show me where, or you’re being harassed elsewhere?
I am not going to crawl through multiple assholes’ post history, to find the parts that pissed me off the most, when I’m not tolerating this conversation. I didn’t name names until you demanded I do so, and then you invited those assholes to shitpost anew. My expectations for what you’d even do with receipts is subterranean.
Give proven trolls endless chances, says infuriating dingus. Surely recognizing someone’s an asshole based on how they act over and over and over is the same thing as prejudice.
You’re not allowed to have an opinion unless you can show me receipts, right now.
I’m not a troll, anyone can go through my post and comment history and tell that I put a serious effort into learning and studying theory, discussing it with others, and in recent months have begun doing actual org work IRL (though limited for now). I’m often called a troll as ad hominem meant to discredit anything I say, but that’s just not accurate. It’s just easy to reduce me to a troll to justify not actually listening to what I say, I suppose.
Yea, it’s odd, but figured I’d respond to their claims anyways for others to see. Maybe they don’t want to feel “dogpiled on” even if they can’t see? Plus I think I’m the only one that actually responded anyways out of that list, and the Yogthos mention looks broken anyways.
Yea, there are a few users that have permanent hatred for me and will mention me out of the blue like that as someone they specifically hate, terminally online behavior IMO but whatever.
Oh fuck off, don’t drag the tankies I’ve blocked into a thread talking shit about them. What an amazing idea for constructive conversation!
So you want to dismiss them but don’t want to actually have them combat your strawmen? Good idea, surely you’re not posting your ass by doing this.
“I have invited multiple bad-faith addicts to harass you. Be grateful! This is your fault!”
You’re totally not acting in bad faith at all here, not at all.
Correct, I’m not. I’ve been bluntly honest and fairly specific the whole time. Do you not know what bad faith means? It wouldn’t surprise me, when you think endlessly bickering with sea-lions is the only the appropriate response, and anything less must be proving them right.
There’s people whose behavior I’ve long since written off as consistently irrational, infuriating, and worst of all, shielded by their equally shitty moderators and admins. Why the fuck would I want to hash it out with them, for your amusement?
Not my amusement at all, I don’t really care too much. It’s just kinda weird that you talk about people and then when they are invited to the same soap box it’s fowl play to you.
Also more strawmen from you about me isn’t helping your case. You can’t build an argument from an army of them.
Aren’t you being a little hypocritical when you participate in a community that doesn’t allow people to defend themselves?
people also have the right to block people they don’t like, simple as, you can’t get upset over that
‘Weird how you don’t want to talk to the people you never want to see again.’
Troll.
Anyone who disagrees with you is a troll. Lemme know when you block me too.
What was the first sentence, buddy? What’s the argument you’ve ignored three times now?
Do you know what having an opinion would look like, or is it just ctrl+f for my username and attack attack attack?
People defending themselves after you told other people they believe a bunch of shit you just made up isn’t harassing you.
Defending yourself from slander is the real harassment.
“I didn’t see it so it didn’t happen.”
Are you saying they’ve professed those beliefs, but elsewhere and I should believe you even though you won’t show me where, or you’re being harassed elsewhere?
Why should he give links to prove his points? He’s angry that’s all that matters!
“PROVE YOUR OPINIONS TO ME OR YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE THEM!”
It gets weird when that opinion is just spreading lies about what other people on Lemmy say.
I am not going to crawl through multiple assholes’ post history, to find the parts that pissed me off the most, when I’m not tolerating this conversation. I didn’t name names until you demanded I do so, and then you invited those assholes to shitpost anew. My expectations for what you’d even do with receipts is subterranean.
Fuck off.
Well that’s a wonderful way to make sure your preconceived notions can never be altered by evidence.
Give proven trolls endless chances, says infuriating dingus. Surely recognizing someone’s an asshole based on how they act over and over and over is the same thing as prejudice.
You’re not allowed to have an opinion unless you can show me receipts, right now.
I’m not a troll, anyone can go through my post and comment history and tell that I put a serious effort into learning and studying theory, discussing it with others, and in recent months have begun doing actual org work IRL (though limited for now). I’m often called a troll as ad hominem meant to discredit anything I say, but that’s just not accurate. It’s just easy to reduce me to a troll to justify not actually listening to what I say, I suppose.
He has you blocked so I don’t know why he cares about you being mentioned.
Yea, it’s odd, but figured I’d respond to their claims anyways for others to see. Maybe they don’t want to feel “dogpiled on” even if they can’t see? Plus I think I’m the only one that actually responded anyways out of that list, and the Yogthos mention looks broken anyways.
Clearly being pinged when someone wants you to defend yourself is evil, or something.
Can’t expect much from a transphobe.
Yea, there are a few users that have permanent hatred for me and will mention me out of the blue like that as someone they specifically hate, terminally online behavior IMO but whatever.
I disagree with you at times due to the fact you support more Marxist/Leninist/Maoist thought, but yeah it’s terminally online behavior.
Happens to UniversalMonk too.