Are you saying they’ve professed those beliefs, but elsewhere and I should believe you even though you won’t show me where, or you’re being harassed elsewhere?
I am not going to crawl through multiple assholes’ post history, to find the parts that pissed me off the most, when I’m not tolerating this conversation. I didn’t name names until you demanded I do so, and then you invited those assholes to shitpost anew. My expectations for what you’d even do with receipts is subterranean.
Correct, I’m not. I’ve been bluntly honest and fairly specific the whole time. Do you not know what bad faith means? It wouldn’t surprise me, when you think endlessly bickering with sea-lions is the only the appropriate response, and anything less must be proving them right.
There’s people whose behavior I’ve long since written off as consistently irrational, infuriating, and worst of all, shielded by their equally shitty moderators and admins. Why the fuck would I want to hash it out with them, for your amusement?
Not my amusement at all, I don’t really care too much. It’s just kinda weird that you talk about people and then when they are invited to the same soap box it’s fowl play to you.
Also more strawmen from you about me isn’t helping your case. You can’t build an argument from an army of them.
So you want to dismiss them but don’t want to actually have them combat your strawmen? Good idea, surely you’re not posting your ass by doing this.
“I have invited multiple bad-faith addicts to harass you. Be grateful! This is your fault!”
People defending themselves after you told other people they believe a bunch of shit you just made up isn’t harassing you.
“I didn’t see it so it didn’t happen.”
Are you saying they’ve professed those beliefs, but elsewhere and I should believe you even though you won’t show me where, or you’re being harassed elsewhere?
“PROVE YOUR OPINIONS TO ME OR YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE THEM!”
It gets weird when that opinion is just spreading lies about what other people on Lemmy say.
I am not going to crawl through multiple assholes’ post history, to find the parts that pissed me off the most, when I’m not tolerating this conversation. I didn’t name names until you demanded I do so, and then you invited those assholes to shitpost anew. My expectations for what you’d even do with receipts is subterranean.
Fuck off.
You’re totally not acting in bad faith at all here, not at all.
Correct, I’m not. I’ve been bluntly honest and fairly specific the whole time. Do you not know what bad faith means? It wouldn’t surprise me, when you think endlessly bickering with sea-lions is the only the appropriate response, and anything less must be proving them right.
There’s people whose behavior I’ve long since written off as consistently irrational, infuriating, and worst of all, shielded by their equally shitty moderators and admins. Why the fuck would I want to hash it out with them, for your amusement?
Not my amusement at all, I don’t really care too much. It’s just kinda weird that you talk about people and then when they are invited to the same soap box it’s fowl play to you.
Also more strawmen from you about me isn’t helping your case. You can’t build an argument from an army of them.
Aren’t you being a little hypocritical when you participate in a community that doesn’t allow people to defend themselves?
people also have the right to block people they don’t like, simple as, you can’t get upset over that
‘Weird how you don’t want to talk to the people you never want to see again.’
Troll.
Anyone who disagrees with you is a troll. Lemme know when you block me too.
What was the first sentence, buddy? What’s the argument you’ve ignored three times now?
Do you know what having an opinion would look like, or is it just ctrl+f for my username and attack attack attack?
I didn’t even connect the dots until 5 minutes ago. Sorry I have pattern recognition.
Ironic from your end.