Your Party is too important to fall at the first hurdle. If you agree that the founding conference should be organised by a democratically elected body, sign your name.
The prospect of this new party has given a lot people hope and it shouldn’t be allowed to fail before it has properly begun.
If you read the plan. You will note it dose not matter.
First yes the names have been published. But as none of us know them very well that means nothing.
The process commited to is much more important. And that process involves those names being removed from control as the end step. Running a membership drive being the only thing they will be authed to do. As soon as that drive is active. A new collection of stewards is to be elected. (Using STV)
Whos only task is to continue the membership drive. And organise the conference and leadership election.
Names who created it or signed it? I cannot see who created the text, just recent signatures.
How do you know? What background is behind it?
Meetings being documented is a good thing. Still need to know more of the origins of this. I’m not in xitter/BSky, so how do I find this?
If you read the plan. You will note it dose not matter.
First yes the names have been published. But as none of us know them very well that means nothing.
The process commited to is much more important. And that process involves those names being removed from control as the end step. Running a membership drive being the only thing they will be authed to do. As soon as that drive is active. A new collection of stewards is to be elected. (Using STV)
Whos only task is to continue the membership drive. And organise the conference and leadership election.
Honestly read the proposal.