someone asked a loaded question that included the term “genocide” in regards to the conflict, Carney answered thats why we have an arms embargo. Then that suddenly turned into Carney accepting that it was indeed a genocide from which he quickly tried to distance himself. Its just some asshats asking loaded questions to try to stir up shit.
Yes sure, it’s pointless for politicians to make that indictment when they have no intention or interest with prosecution.
It also distracts from actionable issues like civilian deaths, emergency services and healthcare infrastructure being destroyed, the lack of press, sanitation, food supplies, power and water.
What did carney say?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-clarifies-genocide-remarks-1.7506027
Seems he’s back tracking a bit now.
He shouldn’t have back tracked. The Democrats here refused to acknowledge it, and a bunch of people refused to vote for them as a result.
someone asked a loaded question that included the term “genocide” in regards to the conflict, Carney answered thats why we have an arms embargo. Then that suddenly turned into Carney accepting that it was indeed a genocide from which he quickly tried to distance himself. Its just some asshats asking loaded questions to try to stir up shit.
It is a genocide, though.
Yes sure, it’s pointless for politicians to make that indictment when they have no intention or interest with prosecution.
It also distracts from actionable issues like civilian deaths, emergency services and healthcare infrastructure being destroyed, the lack of press, sanitation, food supplies, power and water.
If every foreign politician agreed it was a genocide, people would be more likely to act.
OK why don’t they agree on arms embargoes, and other sanctions relating to humanitarian issues…
Cause few enough politicians are calling it genocide, that Bibi can accuse the few people who do of antisemitism.
The rest are cowards.
If that’s your take from this, you might be the asshat