Can? How? Go read any intro book on epistemology. You are talking out of your ass and it’s disrespectful to everyone that actually takes knowledge and human progress seriously.

Nah. Define your axioms like I said. If you won’t, you can’t.

You apparently have no idea

Define “tainted”, “wrong”(your word I never used that word) and how the context of history is not required to detect such things.

Define what we know in a way that doesn’t have a historical basis.

That’s a very uneducated take, and shows that you don’t understand how access to information can be changed, and modeled to elicit certain outcomes.

Alright, thanks for confirming my opinion.

Things don’t happen that way. “Can, may, could” means that there will be pockets of people that don’t subscribe to the ideology and undermine it.

That “could” is doing a lot of work for that premise. We are currently structured as an amalgam of disparate chains of systems interacting with each other in loosely defined ways.

If you want to take the ability of sovereign entities to self determine, then sure we “could” organize in this way.

But we don’t have a god emperor of earth, so we will need to rely on this loose consensus instead of a dictated one.

Wikipedia citing sources is exactly what keeps it accurate. Conflicting primary sources are both considered, and the discrepancies discussed.

That’s a very uneducated take, and shows that you don’t understand how access to information can be changed, and modeled to elicit certain outcomes.

Unbiased, well cited repositories of information are essential.

Thank you!

recently

My wife loves apple sauce, who did this to her

That’s probably just to compensate for grip strength or range of motion with the knife.

By backwards do you mean point near the elbow? If so you can get more leverage that way.

I had thought she was in renal failure and her ex husband wouldn’t let her see her kids

Ok, you can go and talk about whatever you want. I’ll do the same.

We recently received a response from the Chair UZH Faculty of Arts and Sciences Ethics Commission which:

Informed us that the University of Zurich takes these issues very seriously. Clarified that the commission does not have legal authority to compel non-publication of research.

I don’t think they can prevent publication, at least they are saying they can’t

Ah I did not know the difference, you are correct

https://columbiasurgery.org/news/daniel-hale-williams-and-first-successful-heart-surgery

Edit I fixed the title thank you

I’ll follow the rules the best I can.

Ooof the response from the ethics commission is very neutered.

Maybe they can’t comment on discipline matters outside of what they said, it’s really surprising if they stopped at a warning about this.

Smart lady