In an unexpected mask off “secure” email and VPN provider Proton took the stance of siding with the fascist MAGA Reps. Proton’s services are no option for me and many others any longer. Let’s collect and discuss alternatives (E2E encrypted email and VPN) here 🔐👇

Always try to provide:

-Server location (jurisdiction)

-Governance

-Integrity/trustworthiness/transparency

-User experience/ease of use (grade 1 to 10, lets take Proton as a benchmark with an 8)

-Pricing and links

If you know alternative setups, feel free to share, too.

#ProtonExodus

Background: https://lemmy.ca/comment/13913116

Edit:typo

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Misinformation. OP is advocating that you shoot yourself in the foot.

    The CEO said something silly on Twitter which revealed either that (a) he shares an exceedingly banal opinion with literally half of America or (b) he’s not above a bit of preemptive sycophancy to advance his (positive) anti-trust agenda.

    There’s nothing particularly scandalous in the offending tweet:

    • Implying that the Democrats are now “the party of big business” is arguably true (and very boring)
    • Implying that the Republicans now “stand for the little guys” is dumb but also arguably true, unfortunately - the working classes swung to Trump in the recent election while the Democrats are fast becoming a party of high-earning elites (which is why they lost)
    • Saying that the antitrust actions began under Trump I is, well, true

    Proton is not owned Zuck-like by its CEO. It’s controlled by a foundation with other stakeholders on the board, including the inventor of the Web himself. In its niche it is still by far the best option. Ditching it for a nebulous non-existent alternative because the CEO expressed a dumb and extremely commonplace opinion is just silly and self-defeating.

    PS: to be clear, OP is peddling misinformation because it’s not true that “Proton took the stance” of anything. It’s the personal opinion of the CEO that’s at issue. It’s a major distinction. I find it disappointing that people interested in privacy would have such little respect for a private individual’s right to have their own thoughts.

    PPS: to be extra clear, my comments are about the post above, not stuff that people are reading elsewhere. But the substance stands. See discussion for detail.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Implying that the Democrats are now “the party of big business” is arguably true (and very boring)

      While true in some scenarios, in anti-trust Lina khan’s ftc has done significantly more than trump ever did. Biden keeping her over the protest of countless business execs and daily articles in the wall street journal on how she’s ruining America shows some commitment to prosecuting big tech.

      Meanwhile, trump’s anti-trust moves were mostly based off petty issues he had with the ceos or the platforms having a “liberal bias”. Now that every big tech ceo has fallen in line and given him $1 million for his inauguration I doubt we’ll see much movement on that front.

    • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I largely agree with what you’re saying, except the official Proton Mastadon account doubled down on that personal opinion. That seems pretty clear that it’s endorsed not just by that one individual on the board.

        • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          Archives in case they delete it:

          https://web.archive.org/web/20250115165213/https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

          https://archive.is/lBQd8

          Text copy of their post:

          Corporate capture of Dems is real. In 2022, we campaigned extensively in the US for anti-trust legislation.

          Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote.

          At a 2024 event covering antitrust remedies, out of all the invited senators, just a single one showed up - JD Vance.

          By working on the front lines of many policy issues, we have seen the shift between Dems and Republicans over the past decade first hand.

          Dems had a choice between the progressive wing (Bernie Sanders, etc), versus corporate Dems, but in the end money won and constituents lost.

          Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.

          • XNX@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            This doesn’t seem bad? Its true dems embraced the corporate side. The republicans suck and are only going after tech until tech bows down to them (like zuck has been doing) but the post isn’t really outrageous or worse than the first tweet

    • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      The privacy community is always told to verify, not trust. The board of Proton have decided to publicly state something that leads a lot of people to be unable to trust them - namely supporting the choices of an extreme right wing leader who has repeatedly demonstrated the foolishness of trusting anything he says or does.

      This CEO is totally free to have their own thoughts but its verging on the ridiculous to think that other people aren’t going to have a negative reaction to them and seek alternatives. Its next to impossible to trust a company that express approval of Trump decisions because its impossible to trust Trump. And Proton going out of their way to publicly state their approval when they are not even a US org and would’ve lost nothing by simply not saying anything suggests a board that was keen to publicly express support for Trump. It inevitably makes people who are already on the receiving end of Trumpian hate legislation, or who soon will be, wonder what else Proton might be willing to do for Trump in the future.

  • ziproot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Server locations: Riseup is in the US (Washington state), so keep that in mind. Disroot is in the Netherlands (part of the EU).

    Governance: Riseup: Look at their “about us” page. Disroot: Look at their “about” page. The terms of service are more detailed. tl;dr: As far as I can tell, these are run by leftists.

    Integrity/Transparency: I have no idea how to grade this.

    Ease of Use: Subjective. Riseup VPN is just: install the client, turn it on or off. Disroot is much better with a mail client of some kind, so if you already use one, it’s probably a 10, otherwise, the webmail server isn’t that great. Disroot also requries manual encryption (I’m biased here because I use Kmail which makes PGP really easy to use).

    Pricing and Links: Free https://riseup.net/en/vpn https://disroot.org/en/services/email

    tl;dr: Use collective-run services, not corporate-run services

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Wow, lots of people on Lemmy just look at screenshots of text and dont read anything anymore.

    I dont think he said anything controversial. Read what he wrote.

    He’s not supporting Trump or the Republican party in general. He is calling them out for selecting someone good on antitrust. That’s not controversial.

  • Timber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    systemli.org

    • Germany (I think)
    • Politically leftist
    • Very nice people
    • User experience 8, works fine and people put a lot of effort in
    • It’s free, but you need an invite code
  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    I’ve been very happy with disroot.org, but you have to do your own encryption (I use Thunderbird).

    I think I pay $10 per year for 5 GB, but they have a free plan.

  • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Truly unhinged that they decided to come out on this. Fellas, you are fucking Swiss why throw yourself under the bus for the US election

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Because terrible people literally can’t help themselves. Wait for people to show you who they truly are, they will…

  • The 8232 Project@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    I will continue to use Proton and their services, not because I support or endorse any political decisions from the CEO/board members (and I don’t), but because they provide open source, secure, and private software that I love.

    This is no different than arguing about using GrapheneOS based on the behavior of the maintainers.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    If they think Dollar Store Hitler is going to stand up for small businesses then they’re about to have a rude awakening.

  • Alas Poor Erinaceus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    You could look at infomaniak, but I didn’t have the best experience trying out (or even getting started with) their services. Finding a provider that has all of Proton’s apps is going to be tough (or at least it was from me while I was looking to escape from Tuta). Good luck, tho.

    EDIT: Infomaniak is on F-Droid!

    EDIT EDIT: Infomaniak is only available in Europe! Infomaniak is only available with a European phone number, so using a VPN won’t help! 🙁👎

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Finding a provider that has all of Proton’s apps is going to be toug

      Nobody should be using any provider as one stop shop… That’s how we got cooked by Google and Apple the first time folks.

      Unbundle, mix and match…

      Yeah it auck Proton did this but if you only got one proton service, it is eaiser to either do nothing or switch it.

  • Tin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    The CEO “apologized” this morning (after being duly chastised, I’m sure):

    Hi all, last night, a post from last year from my personal X account suddenly became a topic of discussion here on Reddit. I want to share a few thoughts on this to provide clarity to the community on what is Proton’s policy on politics going forward.

    First, while the X post was not intended to be a political statement, I can understand how it can be interpreted as such, and it therefore should not have been made. While we will not prohibit all employees from expressing personal political opinions publicly, it is something I will personally avoid in the future. I lean left on some issues, and right on other issues, but it doesn’t serve our mission to publicly debate this. It should be obvious, but I will say that it is a false equivalence to say that agreeing with Republicans on one specific issue (antitrust enforcement to protect small companies) is equal to endorsing the entire Republican party platform.

    Second, officially Proton must always be politically neutral, and while we may share facts and analysis, our policy going forward will be to share no opinions of a political nature. The line between facts, analysis, and opinions can be blurry at times, but we will seek to better clarify this over time through your feedback and input.

    The exception to these rules is on the topics of privacy, security, and freedom. These are necessarily political topics, where influencing public policy to defend these values, often requires engaging politically.

    The operations of Proton have always reflected our neutrality. For example, recently we refused pressure to deplatform both Palestinian student groups and Zionist student groups, not because we necessarily agreed with their views, but because we believe more strongly in their right to have their own views.

    It is also a legal guarantee under Swiss law, which explicitly prohibits us from assisting foreign governments or agencies, and allows us no discretion to show favoritism as Swiss law and Swiss courts have the final say.

    The promise we make is that no matter your politics, you will always be welcome at Proton (subject of course to adherence to our terms and conditions). When it comes to defending your right to privacy, Proton will show no favoritism or bias, and will unconditionally defend it irrespective of the opinions you may hold.

    This is because both Proton as a company, and Proton as a community, is highly diverse, with people that hold a wide range of opinions and perspectives. It’s important that we not lose sight of nuance. Agreeing/disagreeing with somebody on one point, rarely means you agree/disagree with them on every other point.

    I would like to believe that as a community there is more that unites us than divides us, and that privacy and freedom are universal values that we can all agree upon. This continues to be the mission of the non-profit Proton Foundation, and we will strive to carry it out as neutrally as possible.

    Going forward, I will be posting via u/andy1011000. Thank you for your feedback and inputs so far, and we look forward to continuing the conversation.

    Original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i2nz9v/on_politics_and_proton_a_message_from_andy/

    Am I being paranoid when I notice that the binary at the end of his username translates to 88?

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Am I being paranoid when I notice that the binary at the end of his username translates to 88?

      Well, there’s a good possibility that he might have been born in 1988. If not, then that doesn’t look very good.

      Personally, I think he’d be an extremely unusual neo-nazi, given his background. So perhaps a bit of Occam’s Razor should be applied here.

    • fastfomo7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      No, 88 is not a bad number. “88” is pronounced like “發發” in Taiwanese, which means ‘making fortune’. And you might also see Taiwanese people using “168” in their usernames, as it has similar meaning.

        • fastfomo7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          Sure, it could be. I wasn’t defending him.
          Just please don’t think most of us using “88” or “888” for hinting Nazis, and “666” for praying Satan.

    • Poop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Not defending the 88, he could be a racist, but he’s apparently from Taiwan. It is a common number in Chinese culture, guessing Taiwan too. Where I live there have been a couple of businesses with “88” in the name and both were Chinese.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number)

  • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Uggghhh I just upped for two years. Fucking asshats are all caving to the orange fuckhead. Probably off to Europe somewhere.