Not sure about a lot of these different languages, but Ruby claims to have taken many many many of its features from smalltalk, so the article is quite strange in that regard too.
Not sure about a lot of these different languages, but Ruby claims to have taken many many many of its features from smalltalk, so the article is quite strange in that regard too.
python already is that comic, to the T. https://chriswarrick.com/blog/2023/01/15/how-to-improve-python-packaging/
Isn’t bonjour the reason that devices like printers famously worked so much better on Mac than windows? I feel like I read an article about that like a decade or two ago.
I’ve found that lego, gunpla, or 3d printing do a really good job of keeping you off of a computer.
I had no clue what the problem was until you pointed it out. I’m so tired of people purposefully misreading shit to make it seem bad.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
wet containing moisture or volatile components
Water is wet. The fact that this is an argument is ridiculous.
Abandoned it? What?
Geez that article is terribly written. But interesting nonetheless!
I have the Wii sports resort jam playing in my head constantly. Does that include part of the infinite knowledge of the universe???
https://open.spotify.com/track/095HPmkmBLYaQeKpbfrMWk?si=8IU8A778Q_ilvkAGLTVQXA
I searched for like 20 minutes but was unable to find the article I was referencing. Not sure why. I read it less than a month ago and it referenced several studies done on the topic. I’ll keep searching as I have time.
Gross. Who would want that?
Overtraining has actually shown to result in emergent math behavior (in multiple independent studies), so that is no longer true. The studies were done where the input math samples are “poisoned” with incorrect answers to example math questions. Initially the LLM responds with incorrect answers, then when overtrained it finally “figures out” the underlying math and is able to solve the problems, even for the poisoned questions.
Not sure if that is a serious question, but it’s because formatting doesn’t depend on the type of variables but going to the definition of a field obviously depends on the type that the field is in.
formatting does depend on the type of variables. Go look at ktfmt’s codebase and come back after you’ve done so…
Maybe my example was not clear enough for you - I guess it’s possible you’ve never experienced working intellisense, so you don’t understand the feature I’m describing.
Lol, nice try with the insult there. I code in Kotlin, my intellisense works just fine. I just think you’re quite ignorant and have no clue what you’re actually talking about.
Ctrl-click on bar. Where does it jump to?
it gives you an option, just like if it was an interface. Did you actually try this out before commenting? Guessing not. And how often are you naming functions the exact same thing across two different classes without using an interface? And if you were using an interface intellisense would work the exact same way, giving you the option to jump to any of the implementations.
I’m sorry, but you clearly haven’t thought this out, or you’re really quite ignorant as to how intellisense works in all languages (including Ruby, and including statically typed languages).
It’s happening on lemmy too. People making posts in multiple subs saying that FF is super buggy, etc.
Reynolds wrap literally has this as a faq on their website because so many people think it.
Dispersed camping. We plan the day before we decide to go. A lot fewer people, dogs can be off leash, etc.
The full size model cannot run on a raspberry pi. It can’t even run on a 4090.