How does it make more sense that “cosmetic” features are in the paid-tier? Would it not be the other way around?
How does it make more sense that “cosmetic” features are in the paid-tier? Would it not be the other way around?
I assume they are not paying for the lyrics, but for the access to the api. The lyrics are also timed to the music and the service they use might do that for them. So, like you say, serving lyrics data costs very little, but that is not what they pay for.
And to add, I don’t really know anything about how this works behind the scenes.
I think most civilians in Gaza are busy trying to survive. People are starving and trying to avoid being killed. Constantly moving. Even if starving refugees did run in to one of the hostages, how and to who would they relay this information? And with that information relayed, what could the informant expect happen to the the camp that they stay in?
Less ink, obviously
So no more playing DJ Screw in my convertible during my roadtrip in Chechnya.
I don’t know too much about GHB, but from the little I’ve heard it sounds like it has a risk of deadly overdose, which I don’t think is the case for the first two examples you mentioned. You probably know more than me so perhaps you can enlighten me if they deserve to be grouped together?
If I recall correctly they notified OpenAI about the issue and gave them a chance to fix it before publishing their findings. So it makes sense it doesn’t work anymore
The article doesn’t say anything about it not being tethered, so I’d assume it still is.
Hard boiled currency.