I just got a new, cheap, fanless micro computer that advertises itself as running Linux, and I spent today looking at Arch-based distros; Cachy made my short list, although I’ve never run it.

Is it suitable for running a headless, fanless mini-PC that’s raspy just going to be a snapclient host?

Is there a “Server” option in the installer? Once I get this set up, it’s going to be running entirely headless and without any peripherals (except the AUX out), and I’d like to strip out all of the unneeded software.

I’ve installed bare Arch before, and it’s a PITA I’d rather avoid; it’s easier to just install Garuda or Endeavor and then uninstall X and Wayland, and everything that depends on them. I’m wondering how Cachy fares in this situation.

Before anyone suggest I use a different, non-Arch distro for this: no. I understand pacman and yay, and I know where Arch puts files that every distro has a different opinion on locating. I’ll play with other distributions and switch when I find one I like more, but this is a device I just want to set up and forget about except for periodic upgrades.

Anyway, what are your opinions on CachyOS? I’ve been pretty happy with Endeavor for desktops, but I wouldn’t put it on a headless server.

It should; screen is older, and tmux was a new alternative to try to address screen’s deficiencies. It’s still more correct to say “tmux is like screen.”

There’s also dvtm, also newer than screen.

I was a longtime screen user before switching to tmux, which is IMHO categorically better. I tried dvtm for a few months, but you have to pair it with something else to get close to tmux, and I found it fussy and difficult.

Then there are a bunch of terminals with built in multiplexors, which baffles me: it binds you to a specific terminal, loses all of the benefits of persistent sessions, and can’t be used remotely over ssh. It’s not clear to me why people build or use those.

If you can boot from USB, I’d look at Ventoy, which will let you put multiple distro ISOs on a single USB stick and then pick one of them to boot from when you boot up. I linked to a tutorial rather than the project page for a quick review.

It could be that OpenSUSE is contributing to your boot issues, and that one of the other distros may have a kernel and configuration that plays more nicely; Ventoy will help you determine this. It’ll also let you play with several distros without having to install all of them, and see if you like one more than another.

If your boot problem is hardware related - either an issue with the hardware itself, or just Linux compatability, then you should stay away from rolling release distros like Arch; while you can configure them to minimize reboots, they’re managed in such a way as to expect people to upgrade frequently, including the kernel, which requires reboots. For example, I run Arch and I love it, but I also tend to not upgrade it very often and the longer between upgrades, the greater the chance of something going wrong during an update. It’s absolutely the least dependency-hellish distro I’ve used if you update frequently, but something like Debian is better if you’re looking for long uptimes.

TL;DR: use Ventoy and try several distros. If you find that your boot problems persist through several distros, ignore rolling-release distros like Arch, Alpine, and Void, and focus on Debian-derived distros like Debian, Ubuntu, or Mint. Or you can try a Redhat derivative, but I hate RPM with the fire of a thousand suns so I’d recommend that last - still, some obviously insane people like it, and it’s an option.

Yeah, mine doesn’t have any of that. It’s just “enable/disable copilot.”

Huh. Copilot was enabled, but I didn’t see any of these options, and I was looking specifically for the one to disable letting them use my code for training.

I turned off copilot in any case, thanks for the reminder. But where do I find the option to disable using my projects to train copilot?

Are there any server admins who aren’t blocking Threads? Everyone should be.

Ooo! Now I want to go run scc on the source and see how much of that is Rust.

It looks fantastic! Looking forward to seeing the finished product.

Ooooo! This time, the front didn’t fall off!

That last pic was painful to see. I’m glad that it looks like you’re past that part; it looked nerve-wracking!

assumes pawns’ gender

It might help, if we knew roughly how long ago the irradiation happened. One fairly reliable way of telling age is looking at major events: counting rings on trees, for example. If any are old enough, you could literally find the ring where the irradiation occurred, then count the rings forward. Even without trees, you can do something similar with core samples - it’s just less precise.

Nice kit. The Ukrainians will figure out how to take them down; Ukraine has been impressing me with their innovation and creativity all throughout this invasion.

Slava Ukranini

Oh, yeah; that’s a good one. I’ve read sci-fi books that are almost this, but less obvious about it; Libertarian wet dreams. I mean, fair enough, there’s plenty of communist fiction. But sometimes it gets a bit absurd.

One of my favorite all-time sci-fi trilogies is The Golden Age trilogy by John C. Wright. And it’s a sort of libertarian fantasy: übermensch against the forces of evil (which aren’t socialists; it’s not that kind of libertarian fantasy) who triumphs mainly by force of sheer will. Great books, and I think the ending is about the best I could imagine, because it inverts the entire libertarian message. The libertarian ideal society exists because The Gods allow it to. It’s kind of like Anarchy Park in whichever Larry Niven book that was: anything goes, except violation of other’s freedom, all enforced by all-mighty AI cops. It’s such a funny caveat.

Incidentally, I didn’t know about that Prisoners Dilemma strategy; thanks! I learned something new today.

I believe this is the article that kicked off support for the idea. Thankfully it’s not a Medium-requires-an-account article

Thank you, that’s one I’m going to read.

“Toxic masculinity,” for instance, a lot of people misunderstand to mean that masculinity is toxic.

Whatt‽‽ ϞϞ(๑⚈ ○ ⚈๑) I thought I was practicing the non toxic version of masculinity!

But I don’t know if this challenge to them is the same as a challenge to Popper.

Well, thanks for the link, in any case. My reading comprehension and analytic skills aren’t completely undeveloped, and while I’ve been known to fall for brief periods for clever sounding schemes*, I’m generally skeptical enough to read between the lines.

I think I have to admit I don’t actually know what Popper has to say on the matter. Though, I get the impression these two authors might agree, at least broadly, and are simply viewing the same problem through different lenses.

He wasn’t the first, but he was the first to really coin the term that stuck. It’s hard to read, if for no other reason than it’s philosophy and my eyes tend to glaze over.

That is, resolving the paradox might be interesting to someone if paradoxes bother them

Yeah, I think it’s a paradox only to absolutists, and I distrust absolutists. There are physical laws of nature that are absolute, and even then we find exceptions; but trying to hold to philosophical absolutes leads to people like Ayn Rand, and Libertarians. So, to paraphrase possibly the best scene in any movie ever, “the code is more what you call guidelines, than actual rules”.

• I once thought flat tax was a great idea, believing it’d get us closer to European-style “finally I don’t have to sorry about this shit for two while months every year” taxes; before a friend pointed out the disproportionate impact a flat tax has on different economic stratuses. Stratusi? Whatever.

Wireguard really changed the landscape, for me, and my entire approach to networking. Suddenly, VPNs became fast and easy, and where previously impractical for casual (hobbyist) admins, it made creating enterprise-grade secure subnets easy. It’s astonishingly stable and reliable, such that my initial concerns about cutting off all access except through the VPN - once a truly nerve-wracking concept - is now a no-brainer. It’s made my network administration easier and more secure. My firewalls are simpler.

Wireguard is one of the biggest high-impact, low-visibility networking game changers I’ve seen in decades.

Is there a source for that response? It sounds good, and I’d like to read a reasoned argument for the paraphrase.

I set up a wireguard VPN network between my computers and servers, and then firewalled off all services except Wireguard, and a few services on one server. That one server is my weak point, but even it has sshd firewalled off except through the Wireguard subnet.

It’s stupidly easy to set up WG subnetworks. I’m not a networking guy, and it was trivial for me to do. If u can run an ssh server, you can set up a Wireguard subnet: just do it.

That’s a decent solution. I was referring to The Paradox of Tolerance. You can disagree with Popper, but it’ll take more that a couple of sentences in Lemme to convince me.

So, you’re on favor of enslaving robots.

Duly noted, H-#1D0146641.

I’m with you; I prefer date versioning for many things. Semver does work really well for things with exposed APIs; it’s a stretch to justify using them with user tools, and especially GUI tools. Semver is used to great effect in Go - which is how it should be use: mainly by the language’s module management system. Outside of that, it’s human readable, but like XML, its main value is to machines, and only secondarily to humans.

Calendar versioning is far more human-oriented, and so more useful for things without exposed APIs or module tooling.