Edit: and just to be snarky: I didn’t type “…” I typed “…”. ;)
*chuckle* I think Lemmy typed those for you, because I typed three periods and got a Unicode ellipsis, and both of those are also unicode ellipses.
Edit: and just to be snarky: I didn’t type “…” I typed “…”. ;)
*chuckle* I think Lemmy typed those for you, because I typed three periods and got a Unicode ellipsis, and both of those are also unicode ellipses.
It still returns relative paths if the input was relative
and it doesn’t resolve “…”
I’ll assume you meant ..
, since is an ordinary filename. (Aside from the “who remembers …?” feature introduced in Windows 95’s
COMMAND.COM
where cd ...
was shorthand for doing cd ..
twice and you could omit the space after cd
if your target was all dots.)
The reason it doesn’t do that is that, when symlinks get involved, /foo/bar/..
does not necessarily resolve to /foo
and making that assumption could introduce a lurking security vulnerability in programs which use it.
Ahh, yeah. In the beginning, Rust was built around the idea that individual files and invoking rustc
are internal details, only relevant for integration into some other build system like Bazel, and that “normal” Rust projects need to be inside a Cargo project structure.
There is in-development work to have official support for something along the lines of rust-script, but it’s still just that… in development. If you want to keep an eye on it, here is the tracking issue.
That’s not how it’s supposed to be.
but for example Vec::new() doesn’t highlight anything at all.
If I do Vec::new(foo, bar)
, I get expected 0 arguments, found 2 (rust-analyzer E0107)
.
but things like passing too many arguments into the println macro doesn’t throw an error.
I don’t get that either, but I’m still running with the Vim configuration I setup on my previous PC from 2011, where I turned off checks that require calling cargo check
or cargo clippy
in the background. From what I remember, a properly functioning default rust-analyzer config should pick up and display anything cargo check
will catch and you can switch it to cargo clippy
for even stricter results.
Or how shown in this example, it did not autocomplete the clone method, while also just accepting .clo; at the end of a String (it also didn’t autocomplete “String”).
I get clone()
, clone_into()
, and clone_from()
as proposed completions for .clo
on my as-you-type completions for foo
where let foo = String::new();
and it proposed a whole bunch of things, with String
at the top when I typed Stri
. (eg. the stringify!
macro, OsString
, mixed in with various results from other crates in the project like serde
)
Depending on your preferences, there’s also Nom if you prefer parser combinators, or lalrpop or grmtools if you prefer LR(1) parsing.
Since reading Which Parsing Approach by Laurence Tratt (author of grmtools), my plan for my own parsing projects has been to use an LR(1) parser generator for the stronger compile-time guarantees.
Thanks. Being the biggest name, Zola is definitely on my list of things to investigate.
I’ll try to fit in sampling it at some point in the near future as a candidate for building on.
I just decided to finally double down and do the work to switch away from WordPress to GitHub Pages and:
pulldown-cmark
-based CLI that I wrote a couple of years ago to render single documents and it’d be nice to retrofit it (or at least its features) onto something Rust-based for my blog. (Hell, just a couple of days ago, after implementing support for shortcodes, I got carried away implementing a complete set of shortcodes for rendering depictions of gamepad buttons like :btn-l-snes:
within passages of text. Bit of a shame, though, that I’d have to either patch pulldown-cmark
or maintain the smart punctuation and strikethrough extensions externally, if I want to hook in shortcodes early enough in the pipeline to be able to implement Compose key-inspired ones like :'e:
/:e':
→ é or :~n:
/:n~:
→ ñ without breaking things.)```svgbob
fenced code blocks which produce rendered diagrams, <price></price>
tags which provide currency-conversion estimation tooltips with the exchange rate defined in a central location, etc.) or have plans for (eg. plotters-generated charts with some kind contributed extension equivalent to matplotlib’s xkcd mode because it’s important, Wikipedia-style infobox sidebars, etc.), I want to experiment with a WebAssembly-based plugin API so I’m not throwing the kitchen sink in.Lemmy hangs whenever I try to post my response (I suspect it doesn’t like the length), so here’s a link to it on Github Gist:
https://gist.github.com/ssokolow/16c9311573eabc7343ff7ff2cc3513b3
It begins as follows and I’ve tried to hyperlink my sources as often as possible:
I’ll try to fill in some of the knowledge gaps and respond to some of your answers from a more user-centric perspective.
I know what they mean. It may not be enormous, functionality-wise, but just the Iterator
trait alone feels enormous when you’re trying to figure out which method does what you want.
I think it’s indicative of a need for more work put into making the UI teach people how to search by function signature.
There was a post on Reddit from 2019 that I loved to link to which was about how the poster rewrote a NodeJS service into Rust.
The original was taken down in response to Reddit enshittifying, but it’s still up on the wayback machine and the graphs were hosted on Imgur, where they’re still up without needing the Wayback machine:
He recently did one about how he and his team set up a fake bitcoin site that would direct scammers to a fake support hotline when they try to withdraw the fake bitcoin, where they’d get stuck running in circles in a voice mail menu maze chasing the illusory bitcoin payout.
I Trapped 200 Scammers in an Impossible Maze
As one commenter put it, “I love how Kit has evolved over the years to find out the best way of making scammers go crazy is to treat them basically the same way Comcast treats their customers.”
Moxie Marlinspike’s My first impressions of web3 is also a very relevant thing to share.
As a sampler of the points made, web3 is already re-centralizing around gatekeepers because the average person doesn’t want to run their own server (or, in the blockchain case, host their own full copy of the blockchain) and, if the supermajority of users can’t see you because the gatekeepers block you, then it doesn’t really matter that you’re technically still up.
The takeaway on that particular point is that pushing for more and easier data portability is probably the best route in the face of how real-world users behave. (eg. anything stored in a git
repository, including GitHub project wiki contents, is a great example of that. You’ve got your data locally with a simple git clone
and you can upload it to a competing service with a simple git push
.)
I’m using the web UI, so I’m assuming whatever broad-spectrum Markdown rendering library it uses has smart quote rendering turned on.