E

That makes sense.

But why? How is that useful for users? Why not make the switch when the hardware exists?

Why? The article doesn’t really help.

To threaten the status quo it’s bad but to have fun programming a browser it’s not bad.

That’s not bad.

You are right, but as you noticed, we don’t argue the same thing.

eventually killed the thing and forced MS to switch to Chromium.

Ladybird is not threatened to be killed by whatever anybody but the developers do.

doubt that a bunch of random developers will succeed where Microsoft

Ladybird doesn’t have to be profitable and the org cannot be bought.

If you go 300km/h by train and 900km/h by plane then the numbers don’t add up.

How much would you pay for it?

Doesn’t that distract him from figuring out what he really wants?

Smurfs love a mushroom cloud.

Was this a big thing I somehow missed?

It’s one of the many small things that hide the big thing. In 2027 android will be fully locked down, unnecessarily.

The big thing is whatever the lockdown is for.

What we aren’t seeing yet is these facts seriously impacting politics.

What else is chat control and age verification about? Politicians expect an unruly population.

That depends on what gait measurement entails to you. I would think so but Wikipedia says that it is just movement analysis.

Don’t forget that when you walk the length of your bones can be measured which can be used to identify you.

Why do journalists do this sort of thing

They are professionals and write however they are paid to write.

What if the sheep are also cynical and happily enjoy the benefits while the leaders shield them from blame and bad conscience?

however it will need critical mass to attract content consumers.

My guess is that that’s the reason why OP wants to focus on one platform. Pick a winner and bring the traffic.

That’s a trap. It keeps the powerusers on Youtube instead of motivating them to seed a new platform.