In this case if they have evidence, they should be investigated as is being done.
My critique is on the general sense of tolerance/intolerance as that can be vague, although unjustified incitement of violence or violent action is a good place to draw a line. However what is a call to violence can be tricky to parse sometimes.
Sure, but your methodology for determining what is an anti-democratic idea should be really tight, before you raid/arrest people.
No one wants murders in their society, but showing that they did that action is more important than stating that an action is wrong/anti-democratic/immoral etc.
Your take is much better, and I can see that being a thing. But “smelling glucose” - I don’t even know what that means exactly 😀
What? This sounds like BS
Both limits are stupid.
Woah, before we go into “eventual organ failure”, can you provide something pertaining to reusable bottles because the link you provided doesn’t make such claims.
Thank you, I think your answer is much better. Still I don’t think “Capitalism” is an informative answer to why/how these search suggestions work.
Yeah, what about it?
Why is the presence of some inter-species violence a justification for harming someone from that group?
Also small children, feral humans and some severely disabled people cannot properly uphold our moral standards. Can we eat them?
Are you trolling?
Do I have a perfect idea for you, for a restaurant - you can order anything you like and the bill is always going to be $1.00. But at the end the restaurant chooses the tip amount.
WOW that’s crazy, just 1 buck 😲. And the customers will always be happy because the meals are not expensive.