​

@nmtake @fediverse >Akkoma is currently leading in this regard with their MRF feature, which allows administrators to write arbitrary polices to rewrite or delete messages
Yeah, bub, about that: https://akkoma.dev/AkkomaGang/akkoma/src/branch/develop/lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf.ex#L67
You’re not allowed to reject or mangle activities of specific types in your own policies, and said change was introduced for no reason other than spite. Pleroma, which Akkoma rips off, has no such restrictions.

@bmygsbvur Pleroma is exactly the same and no one cared in six years.

@jeff @3 @AyyLMAO @mia @95fcf7a75b14e755fb3926023dd670233c41b69f90497494a8c4547bb145d4c3 @shitpisscum @shitpisscum Don’t ask me, ask pleromer devs.

@shitpisscum @3 @AyyLMAO @jeff @mia @95fcf7a75b14e755fb3926023dd670233c41b69f90497494a8c4547bb145d4c3 @shitpisscum Not sure what does rawr have to do with it. CORS is set to default Pleroma one which is wildcard, proper CSP is also there.

@mia @3 @AyyLMAO @jeff I believe it should already work as long as some nostrich manages to stumble upon the thread.

@AyyLMAO >Have you heard about the ActivityPub protocol
What do you think half of the thread is discussing? My point was, different AP implementations with different purposes (in this case, Pleroma/Misskey/Mastodon/whatnot on one side, Lemmy on other) define their behavior independently. Hence the inherited mentions here and lack of them on Lemmy’s side. I don’t even mind it that much, it makes the network more fun.
>You know what, just forget about it. Let’s not interact again.
Oh well.

@lewdthewides @AyyLMAO Just a consequence of trying to make physically incompatible discussion platforms (Reddit-lite and Twitter-lite) speak the same protocol.