

Waiting for an enterprising weapons manufacturer to release a new gun named the “Term Limit”
Waiting for an enterprising weapons manufacturer to release a new gun named the “Term Limit”
Yeeees! This is what we need to see
Colin Mochrie.
This is a game called Helping Hands. Colin, you’re going to be Donnie’s hands and in this scene Donnie is trying to change his own diaper in the middle of a the Oval Office during a press event with the Canadian Prime Minister.
What’s next? Femtofunctions
How about, you give me AI ‘enhancement’ and more ads and I’ll give you my solemn word to never use your browser again? Deal?
deleted by creator
I see, we don’t have such things over here. Thanks for the explanation.
Odd, I just looked up a famous national park in the UK and it’s listed as ‘National Park’
I’m fine with fewer details, 'k thanks.
Robinson, the premier surname for all right-wing asshats.
Having used Apple computers since the Apple II+, I think I’m allowed to say that the vast majority of Apple’s mouse designs have been utter trash. The one that I might give a pass to is the ADB Mouse 2. I’m not expecting Apple to change the habit of a lifetime by designing a comfortable mouse.
I was on the verge of starting a subscription to try out the AI generated playlists in PlexAmp. I hope they provide a similar integration with another service provider.
Image credit to Dong 🤌
My face, screaming in horror, but in words instead. I’ve only really worked with projects in homogenous languages on the application side, so hadn’t considered that. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
There is an IETF standard for UUIDs? Do we need an IETF standard for UUIDs? I’ve been coding since the '90s and never thought a UUID to be complicated or contentious enough to need a standard. I guess it makes for a pretty unique icebreaker to say you’ve contributed to an IETF standard, if you get invited to those sort of parties.
One of the critical differences between FOSS and commercial software is that FOSS projects don’t need to drive sales and consequently also don’t need to immediately jump onto technology trends in order to not look like they’re lagging behind the competition.
What I’ve consistently seen from FOSS over the 30 years I’ve been using it, is that if a technology choice is a good fit for the problem, then it will be adopted into projects where relevant.
I believe that there are use cases where LLM processing is absolutely a good fit, and the projects that need that functionality will use it. What you’re less likely to see is ‘AI’ added to everything, because it isn’t generally a good solution to most problems in it’s current form.
As an aside, you may be less likely to get good faith interaction with your question while using the term ‘luddite’ as it is quite pejorative.
Uranium is natural. Not sure what it tastes like. Perhaps someone would be kind enough to report back.
I’m sitting down, waiting for Scott Manley’s analysis video to drop. I’d hope there are valid and sane reasons why they thought it should go ahead, but something like this was so obviously going to happen.
If something good is continuously almost happening, it’s ‘edging’