- 5 Posts
- 41 Comments
hayk@lemmy.mlto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•PixiEditor 2.0 - a FOSS Universal 2D Graphics Editor is here
0·7 months agoGod almighty, how come I’m hearing about this for the first time??? this thing basically does everything GIMP does but better. I mean, node-based editor… are you kidding me, it’s incredible!
after a couple of hours of playing, their node editor is still a bit raw (not blender level), but the foundation is very solid. i’m willing to back this project financially (after I use it for a week or so), and I strongly suggest you do too (if you find it similarly useful). we really need more projects like this so that (a) people stop using adobe, and (b) GIMP devs finally realise that to maintain the audience they actually have to do something.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agoWhat do you actually use as a VM backend? VirtualBox limits the VRam you can allocate, and other options (vmware) I’m not even sure work with linux.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
3·2 years agoIn the old days laptops were rare and accessible only to selected few. The others in the background were just admiring the flawless handwork the arch user is displaying with the command line.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agofrom someone’s … posterior? … latter end? … tuchus? arse is a bit more descriptive, eh?
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
91·2 years agoHow much do you think I earn to afford paying for Office or Adobe? :) i’ve never paid for any of those, even though I’ve been using Adobe since CS5.
As for donating: i agree, for now i sometimes help in contributing to the codebase in a bit smaller apps i actually can fix things in.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
3·2 years agoI used WPS, it was worse than Libre from the usability, plus quite bloated with all sorts of stuff (luckily, I don’t have to pay for the Office, and will never actually do that willingly). Haven’t used the other two, however, will have a look, thanks!
Both GIMP and Krita are very nice and decent, just not powerful enough for many things I need photoshop for. Inkscape is actually much closer to Illustrator (not as powerful, but still), so that might be the only one with the “getting used to it” issue.
Actually, one other thing I should have mentioned, is that I also transited from using Premiere Pro to Kdenlive (and sometimes even Blender for very light video editing). Kdenlive is an amazing success story for KDE, hope that happens to Krita as well.
PS. The name GIMP sounds amazing! Love it, they should never change it )
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agoThis has been some time ago. Because of the apps I mentioned I had to transit after a week of usage. But in that week, it was kinda nice. I don’t think from the upkeep standpoint it’s too different from other distros. Like I said, the main hard-to-overcome issues come from hardware support, often due to vendors unwilling to release drivers for Linux. But most of the major vendors (intel, amd, nvidia, etc.) have decent linux support nowadays, even not considering the myriad of open-source drivers.
I was also genuinely surprised with how well DEs nowadays support touchpads, and how customizable the gestures can be. That being said, ofc like I said, some of the apps do not release Wayland support (mainly the electron-based ones).
In short, lots of things are a bit more complicated than on Mac or Windows, but a lot of other things are much more straightforward and customizable.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
4·2 years agoA free-falling observer lives in a locally Minkowskian space-time, so feels no such thing. So I like my metric flat.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agoyes, i think we can all agree at least on the last point: that developing forward as a community, any Linux is better than corporate OSs. not because they’re evil products of capitalist agenda (even though that’s the case), but because developing them allows you to have a choice, and also incentivizes large companies to meet these security and freedom standards.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agoyeah, i mean apart from people satisfying their masochistic desires and highlighting their moral superiority by using CLI (look mama, ima hacker), Arch is genuinely a great OS. and, honestly, like i argued in my post, not as “masochistic” to install as people paint it to be.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agoi experimentally found that peeing standing (handstanding to be precise) is the ultimate way, so i learned how to do that (like i said, was last year)
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agoin my case it was kinda easy, since they were actually linked in the Arch wiki directly!!! but, yes, i guess in general it might be an issue. maybe look for keywords such as “easyeffects profile <YOUR SPEAKERS>” or something along these lines. you can also play around a little with the app to find the settings that work for you.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
2·2 years agoagree, yes, especially the ProtonDrive configured through rsync: i really need it to be reliable, since i often travel and absolutely need my documents synced automatically with my PC. even in the early versions of ProtonDrive windows/mac app, it was often not syncing, and i would find myself on the road need to download a few gigs worth of slides and pdfs.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
2·2 years agototally understand it. it took me about a full day to setup everything the way i liked (i’m also quite picky when it comes to usability), but honestly the next time i do it, i can probably do it in a couple of hours, since i now know all the ins and outs.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agotried it… :( not really a replacement for me
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agoarse!
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
1·2 years agohonestly, i like the idea of Arch being completely bare bone. you can then keep track of everything you install afterwards, and that helps a lot when later you try to troubleshoot any issues, since you know exactly what’s installed, what’s modified, and what’s running in the background.
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
6·2 years agolike i mentioned above in the comment, i really meant to say OnlyOffice (but i also tried Libre, and a bunch of others)
hayk@lemmy.mlOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Tried Arch for the first time | My experience and impressions
3·2 years agoI very much hope so too!!! i made myself to drift away from the Fusion 360 (they just took it a step further by moving a lot of stuff to the cloud) towards the FreeCad, and am enjoying its capabilities ever since. hope the same happens to GIMP. and it’s not about getting used to it after Photoshop, it just really lacks some of the basic functionality i absolutely need.

I call it motivation ( : I mean no offense to GIMP, they’re definitely the ones who broke the monopoly originally. but since the time I started using it like 10 years ago to now with the release of GIMP 3 barely anything has changed, yet there already are quite a few open source alternatives that shine brighter at very specific niches.