I’ll check those out. Is there a Canadian store like Dick’s that sells all 3 brands?

Their website says their core goose down products are all made in Canada.

I’m planning on buying canadien goods when I’m driving through half of the country this summer. I need a decent winter coat, so I’ll pick up a Canada goose.

Usually after lots of arguing and crying. But I wouldn’t have had wifi on my first laptop without it.

ndiswrapper shudder

I guess you never watched “Deadwood”?

Wheres your monitor for email and IM?

14" is my jam. Hits my sweet spot between portability and usefulness. My work gave me some giant monstrosity (Dell precision 17"). It’s horrible and stays in it’s docking station. I refuse to take it on trips.

I ended up buying a portable 15" monitor so that when I’m forced to work on laptop, I have the option to use dual display. Basically the same size as a large tablet.

By your logic it would be a positive for your code to have errors/warnings. And on the latter, that would appropriate if there was a test that determined if you are free from all known diseases (or at least those that it can detect).

That’s why I said false negative. The medical test is testing for the presence of a disease. So if they find the disease is considered a positive test (it found what it was looking for). For static analysis on code, its the opposite. Its testing if your code is free of issues that it can detect. If it finds no issues, then the test was positive. If does find issues, the test failed and each issue is a negative that contributed to the test failing.

Warnings and errors are negatives not positive. So if it generates a warning that is OK, it’s a false negative.

All of those derivative works are licensed.

Creating a derivative work without a license to do so would be copyright infringement.

Yes but you don’t have a right to create derivative works which by definition is all that AI can spit out.

You can just login at office.com on your mobile browser.

Then things will have to wait until the code is of sufficient quality to be accepted.

My experience is exactly the opposite. I don’t work for a FAANG but I’ve been around the block a bit. Its always the junior devs that try and add new warnings etc to the code base. I always require warnings to be cleaned up even if that means disabling specific instances (but not the whole rule) because the rule is flagging a false negative.

This one kind of reminds of Larry Ellison but looks a bit more human than the real Larry

So you’re saying my 10 lb jack russell has less complex brain than a Labrador Retriever?