This is partially cause there’s less physical media and if you don’t buy it immediately on release it’ll probably cost more

That should’ve healed by then though

I say within 50 years they’ll declare it all Israel

You forgot the killings

Here’s a link if you want to include in your comment.

It’s a site that compares car sizes. This link is for the 3 series

https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/bmw-3-1997-sedan-vs-bmw-3-2018-sedan/

And here’s a dodge challenger which surprisingly is fatter but slightly shorter and higher

https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/dodge-challenger-1969-coupe-vs-dodge-challenger-2015-coupe/

Now put in a law saying you can’t do that

For uploading game clips I’d assume

I completely agree that’s what I meant by the 3rd party. Those who will refuse to vote for either and I tend to find that more common from those who would’ve voted Democrat compared to the ones that would’ve voted Republican

For us to do so yes. For the government, it constantly breaks the law

Funny-ly enough you can block their signal. Issue is it’s also going to block everyone within range

You’re forgetting a decent subset. Ones who are informed but would rather vote 3rd party, which due to not having Teddy Roosevelt won’t do shit, rather than vote for either of these guys

I understand for the life of the company. But it’s not even my steam account. It’s my child’s who’s currently -5 years old (give or take). I did create it on their behalf a decade ago to redeem the free games on their behalf and gift them games I think they’ll enjoy.

Oh I didn’t own my steam account it was created for my future children. it’s a trust.

Oregone*

Depends on how you see it. It could also be that for some reason or another even with backwards time travel no one shows up. And thus you avoid having a paradox

Or it could be like a time portal so once you build one you an travel back to any point it existed in but one to a point where it doesn’t exist since you need time travel infrastructure

I understand that. But building chargers using their ports is an option and will be something that happens. It just answers the customers of other OEMs of whether to charge their cars now. And even if Tesla controls a significant portion of the charging infrastructure now there’ll be others that build chargers with that standard with time. And I’m sure there was some closed door agreement they came up with on pricing

Germ many

It’s a headstart for a robust charging network while other charging station companies build more to catch up

How many ccs chargers are there compared to nas? That’s the question that matters to GM Ford and other automakers

I didn’t really follow. Because the way it happened was, Tesla can make money from it’s charging stations and other OEMs get a robust charging network.