• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 17th, 2024

help-circle


  • This is too broad a topic to have any meaningful discussion on in a comment thread, but I’d start with a few things:

    1. Are you looking for new perspectives, or are you looking to debate? The former implies you’re willing to change your stance, the latter does not.
    2. Define “capitalism”, “communism” and “good”. As a minimum to starting such a discussion, everyone participating should be on the same page regarding the topic, but these are terms that have wildly different meanings for a lot of people (not so much on this instance).
    3. Pick a specific theme to discuss - what do you support most about capitalism? What is your greatest issue with communism? Anything you’re specifically interested in? As I said, it’s a broad topic, so in order to have any constructive discussion, it needs to be narrowed down.











  • The risk is that other EU countries would adopt similar policies and create long-term problems for Taiwan and its 24 million citizens to freely determine their future.

    More like create problems for the US to freely determine Taiwan’s future

    Serious question though, can it still count as self-determination? Afaik the pro-reunification/pro-PRC side has been suppressed for decades, especially at the start of the occupation, and Taiwan is constantly bombarded with anti-PRC propaganda, all thanks to the US

    If we pretend history doesn’t exist and we do what libs did e.g. in Gaza assuming it all started on Oct 7, then sure, people want to separate from the PRC, they should do it

    But this ignores how they got into that position and what “independence” entails (becoming another Ukraine). You get pushed into a direction and then you’re made to think you got there of your own accord



  • This is the second deranged piece they put out on this topic, after this one (probably the same thing though, given the dates).

    The United States needs strategic clarity toward Taiwan, including an explicit pledge to defend Taiwan from an unprovoked Chinese invasion

    Ok cool, so that means they won’t lift a finger, right, because it says “unprovoked”? 🤡

    prevent a conventional war that could escalate

    consider extending its [US] nuclear umbrella over Taiwan

    So they recommend avoiding conventional war and threatening to fire nukes first - sounds like them admitting (again) that they can’t beat China in a conventional war. Yet they’re so unhinged and trigger-happy about nukes.

    plan for possible US nuclear use, and help prepare Taiwan to operate effectively after a nuclear detonation

    Fucking ghouls. Basically “Make sure we can still use the island for military operations after we get it glassed”. They’re ready to irreparably damage Taiwan even more than they’ve enabled in Ukraine.

    Just how much influence does the Atlantic Council have over NATO decisions? From what I heard, it’s fair to say “a lot” but I couldn’t find much info. Do these people end up taking important positions in NATO?