SonnyVabitch

And what’s the answer, don’t leave us hanging!

It’s french, it’s dieunnais.

It would be nice to one time not having to vote for the lesser of two evils.

A few years ago somebody pointed out that twump looks like the front end of a centaur and I cannot unsee it.

Then again, his current posture could be the successful result of a species realignment surgery from mythical to femboy.

I don’t think it’s the wearing of nappies that is worthy of ridicule. You are right, it’s a medical question, people who need it should wear it, and everybody else should just stfu about it. (Except perhaps in the odd case when medical conditions do come into question while assessing the fitness of a candidate to an office, especially such a high stakes and demanding one as the potus, but that’s by the by).

What is chilling is the followers of Trump who try to make a virtue out of it. And ridiculous. Laughing at them is the right response because the other option is utter despair.

A bowel movement if you will…

He was told he couldn’t be a composer after he’d gone deaf, but did he listen??

She’s an inanimate fucking object!

Order Of The Phoenix

Thankfully somebody copied the whole chain of those responses as a reply to my previous comment.

That’s the puppy! Cheers mate.

I was listening to a podcast on moral philosophy (wouldn’t you wanna be as cool as me??), and one suggestion that’s stuck with me was the morality of, trigger warning,

As in, would we as a society want to permit such things, knowing that they could potentially save humans from actual harm if they offer an outlet that scratches an itch? On the other hand, would they bring forth more harmful desires in a greater number of potential perpetrators, leading to even more harm?

Anyway, I’m glad it’s not my job to contemplate such disturbing topics.

Cannon fodder is a gender neutral job.

1. Wank.

2. Maybe another, just in case.

3. Try to find that old reddit thread where some lawyer breaks down what the sensible strategy would be, starting with don’t ever tell a single soul if you can help it.

Sony fabitch!

If they just stay home, that’s half the battle…

What if it’s a new couple of two homeowners who move in together, should they sell one property before the relationship solidifies?

What if the grandchildren are in secondary school when Nana dies, is the family allowed to hold on to this second property for the few years until the kids move out/in?

What if you accept a contract position in another town, should you be forced to sell and buy, or is it okay to rent out the home you have and rent another elsewhere?

My point is that there is nuance at the lower end of the scale, and the enemy is big corporations and landlords of massive portfolios.

Leasehold is a type of property where you rent the land for a really long time (decades), and build your house on it. Every few years you extend the lease so it has no risk of running out. You don’t know how much the landlord will charge you, or indeed if they extend, although there are some legal protections for leaseholders.

I don’t have anything to add other than an anecdote:

I got permabanned from /r/askhistorians for having a “vulgar” username. Yeah, this one that I’m using now. I had been lurking for years, one time I commented a thank you to someone’s reply, and bam! I was gone.

I agree with this, and so should everybody else.