SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.nettoFedigrow@lemm.ee•Who to ban and who to notEnglish
122·
3 days agoIf the majority of people are opposed to racists getting banned, then you’ve got a bigger problem in your community than just a single racist.
Despite my astonishing talent, word of my ascendancy has not yet spread among the masses.
If the majority of people are opposed to racists getting banned, then you’ve got a bigger problem in your community than just a single racist.
Preferably upside down.
But one of the “anarchist” admins of dbzer0 told me that the Ukrainian state isn’t fascist, and worth defending.
Uncritical support to comrade wounds.
This is good for bitcoin.
I see secret agent Truss is up to her old tricks again.
Absolute clown society.
Pinochet stans must be seething right now.
At this rate the news mega is going to explode again very soon.
Why should it matter if the thing was said outside of the community? If they’re a racist, there’s a big chance they’ll say something racist in your own community at some point. Wouldn’t you want to protect your users (especially minorities) from such a possibility? What’s the benefit of having a racist shithead in your community? There is no downside to banning them. At some point you have to draw a line in the sand, or else bad actors will take advantage of this.