That’s why theyre in a hurry to pay politicians to make it very illegal to do the same. It’s like incels making arbitrary rules to stay relevant.

Each fleet has its flagship, all companies have flagships. Yes the best phone of each company is their flagship. Flagship phones isn’t limited to some arbitrary sized companies.

Terms have specific uses, let’s not dilute them to make ourselves feel better. Language IS fluid, but when people are obstinate to already preestablished conventions

Ok there why didn’t you bother opening a dictionary or googling it.

noun

the ship in a fleet which carries the commanding admiral.

the best or most important thing owned or produced by a particular organization.

He’s just saying most phones companies (of all sizes) are making are big phones. Get over yourself

This makes no sense. Large doesn’t mean fancy. Back in the day, making the phone smaller was fancy.

The minimal company’s flagship phone is a minimal phone. It’s their signature phone. The flagship was the ship that had the ranking officer/admiral on it, representing the fleet. Apple, google etc all decided their flagship phone would be huge.

OP wants more flagship phones, that is the type of phone the company markets as its main phone, to be smaller. It has little to do with the best but how phones are used. So tell him “tough luck because most people use their phones as a TV so they will remain big”. It’s not because that’s a better phone.

You have some duolingo to finish up buddy

A bad person can create a good product sure, doesn’t mean we need to support it.

Those are some pretty easy to answer questions?

• for the same reason a kitchen island is in the middle of a corner
• it’s a pallet of eggs, someone dropped it there with a jig
• it seems one side of the corner has a barrier, the pallet attemps to complete it and prevent people from going that way (a cash register might be there). Or the person dropping it wasn’t careful
• only bleached eggs need a fridge, most of the world doesn’t bleach their eggs so they can stay on the counter.
• why not 15? Base 12 makes sense because it’s a highly divisible number (1/2/3/4/6/12) so a lot of stuff are dozens or half a dozens, but there’s no reason eggs need to be. It likely has to do with “the packing problem” which is a difficult math problem of how to shape stuff so you fit the most in a truck load
• other countries have other languages, and even sometimes completely different alphabets that resemble or share the same roots as English
• you are experiencing another culture.

You can often bypass the login requirement by changing you location, or removing everything after and including the ? in the link.

Some who can’t see the above link might be able to see this one (same but without parameters).

Same reason suckerberg went full elon. It’s the gold rush of corporate greed with a conman at the helm

Fortunately what you linked says nothing of the sort. You are in this meme

Enough internet

I did not say Americans support what he does as president. Youre making a different point

Whats funny is none of yall had this “that’s not helpful” attitude when it was the brits throwing themselves in the fire.

Yes, choosing not to vote for example is indirectly making a choice. Weird I know, again, whatever helps americans sleep at night.

Not voting and voting 3rd party is support for Donald, but whatever makes you sleep better at night

What does the phone have to do with this thing that obviously wouldn’t hold for 2 seconds in a car in motion.

We shouldn’t have a majority of voters in the U.S choosing a Nazi, but here we are.

Right, because all vehicles are in motion 100% of the time. Everyone knows that.

I was just summing up a concept I remembered from somewhere. If we’re going to get specific about it, it’s called Weber’s Law, there’s an interesting numberphile video about it about the rate of change, and our experience with different levels of stimulus where the required “ratio” to feel a difference remains the same, which essentially means it takes more to notice the more experiences we’ve had in total. It wasnt an anecdote either, it was a metaphor for that concept / law regarding life experiences. It’s a very real thing.

It being neurons reinforcing connections doesn’t mean there isnt a rate of change, and my example in no way implies there’s a hard drive (nor does Webers law)

Edit: it’s also interesting because it’s the answer to the question of “how much can they shrink the candy bar before we notice?”.

You have to dual wield them looped together, or else it’s just 2 mugs and not inconvenient.

Even holding the 2 mugs together at the same time looped in is less convenient, and they wont both sit straight. I stand by my choice

That works. I assumed in this challenge we cannot alter the inconvenience out. I could fix all those items in theory.