• 0 Posts
  • 99 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • Text below, for those trying to avoid Twitter:

    Most people probably don’t realize how bad news China’s Deepseek is for OpenAI.

    They’ve come up with a model that matches and even exceeds OpenAI’s latest model o1 on various benchmarks, and they’re charging just 3% of the price.

    It’s essentially as if someone had released a mobile on par with the iPhone but was selling it for $30 instead of $1000. It’s this dramatic.

    What’s more, they’re releasing it open-source so you even have the option - which OpenAI doesn’t offer - of not using their API at all and running the model for “free” yourself.

    If you’re an OpenAI customer today you’re obviously going to start asking yourself some questions, like “wait, why exactly should I be paying 30X more?”. This is pretty transformational stuff, it fundamentally challenges the economics of the market.

    It also potentially enables plenty of AI applications that were just completely unaffordable before. Say for instance that you want to build a service that helps people summarize books (random example). In AI parlance the average book is roughly 120,000 tokens (since a “token” is about 3/4 of a word and the average book is roughly 90,000 words). At OpenAI’s prices, processing a single book would cost almost $2 since they change $15 per 1 million token. Deepseek’s API however would cost only $0.07, which means your service can process about 30 books for $2 vs just 1 book with OpenAI: suddenly your book summarizing service is economically viable.

    Or say you want to build a service that analyzes codebases for security vulnerabilities. A typical enterprise codebase might be 1 million lines of code, or roughly 4 million tokens. That would cost $60 with OpenAI versus just $2.20 with DeepSeek. At OpenAI’s prices, doing daily security scans would cost $21,900 per year per codebase; with DeepSeek it’s $803.

    So basically it looks like the game has changed. All thanks to a Chinese company that just demonstrated how U.S. tech restrictions can backfire spectacularly - by forcing them to build more efficient solutions that they’re now sharing with the world at 3% of OpenAI’s prices. As the saying goes, sometimes pressure creates diamonds.

    Last edited 4:23 PM · Jan 21, 2025 · 932.3K Views







  • Citing measurements made at the 1926 Iowa State Fair, they reported that the peak power over a few seconds has been measured to be as high as 14.88 hp (11.10 kW) and also observed that for sustained activity, a work rate of about 1 hp (0.75 kW) per horse is consistent with agricultural advice from both the 19th and 20th centuries […]

    Sounds to me like the 1 hp unit is fair, after all.













  • From the announcement:

    The capabilities in this announcement, which totals up to $6 billion, include:

    Additional munitions for Patriot air defense systems;
    Additional munitions for National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems (NASAMS);
    Equipment to integrate Western air defense launchers, missiles, and radars with Ukraine's air defense systems;
    Counter-UAS equipment and systems;
    Munitions for laser-guided rocket systems;
    Multi-mission radars;
    Counter-artillery radars;
    Additional ammunition for High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS);
    155mm and 152mm artillery rounds;
    Precision aerial munitions;
    Switchblade and Puma Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS);
    Tactical vehicles to tow weapons and equipment;
    Demolition munitions;
    Components to support Ukrainian production of UAS and other capabilities;
    Small arms and additional small arms ammunition; and
    Ancillary items and support for training, maintenance, and sustainment activities.