My Mexican dentist isn’t this funny, but she’s much cheaper.
My Mexican dentist isn’t this funny, but she’s much cheaper.
everything is a google search away
Have you used Google search recently?
The Full movie is worth a watch.
“I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick ass, and I’m all out of bubble gum”
I’m showing how biased your logic is by swapping one word.
Headphone Jacks are also popular. Over 60% preference on android and 92% of people prefer the rear camera
My facts beat your feelings.
it is an inefficient use of internal phone space.
It is only inefficient for you. I never use the selfie camera. Should I be campaigning for its removal?
It adds another physical failure point.
As you don’t use it, you don’t care if it fails.
Increases risk of water entry.
No. This is a solved problem.
And adds construction costs
More so for the selfie camera.
and repair cost.
If you don’t use it, you don’t need it repairing
If you are making music, so is the latency.
The ingredients I chose first are pandas.
I tried playing online once, but even standing still my wanted level crept up and up until I was killed.
Maybe my original ps3 code was outdated.
We see many datapoints gatheredbl by multiple technologies and approaches, but they all use the same cosmological model. The same lens.
Maybe lens was the wrong word. All the data gathered is interpretated using the same brain.
Dark matter is an infinite number of free variables we can place anywhere in our universe to make our current gravitational models work. Of course they match.
Can you call it an observation if the lens you are using may be faulty?
Why is dark matter given so much precedence over model error? (Particularly because we know our current model can’t do things like quantum gravity)
I’m not a subscriber to this particular theory, but I do think model error is a more plausible explanation than magical, undetectable mass.
Actions speak louder than words. Let’s review what happened.
Guilty
Guilty
Guilty. Note that it’s very easy to claim others didn’t follow the rules when you are the ones writing them (possibly retroactively).
Dark energy yes. But lots of cosmologists seem convinced dark matter is proven fact. Why are they so certain?
Quoting a phrase from an internal email out of context makes you seem disingenuous.
Source. Disingenuous is trying to claim the DNC chair was not biased
The emails that were stolen show people being mean,
Showing bias in positions of responsibility is not “being mean”
but it also shows that they were consistently not rigging anything.
Debate questions in advance.
6 heads in a row.
Obtuse financing rules.
Etc.
Or that the only time they talked about financial schemes was after the Sanders campaign alleged misconduct?
She did. Eight years ago.
Yes. Because there was clear evidence of bias. Straight after, Debbie was rewarded with an honorary chair of the Clinton campaign’s 50-state program.
Turns out that preference without misconduct doesn’t have much impact.
How are you sure there was no misconduct?
How are you sure there was no impact?
When their inexperience with the party tools led to them not taking advantage of them, they cried misconduct for the other campaigns knowing about them.
Or, because Hillary controled the party’s finances, procedures were made deliberately obtuse to her advantage.
Every head including Lincoln and JFK?
Why did the playstation not have the same piracy problem?
I think we need to raid futurama’s characters.
I thought the only observation we have of dark matter is via cosmological models.
You can reweight as you please to whatever dataset you like. They can say what the training data included, but they can’t share the dataset.