This one works on my client, while normal ones don’t

Arch is too well made to be made by reddit. While redditors are drawn to it, they could never have actually made it themselves.

Those versions have different axioms from which different things can be proven, but we don’t define 9.9 repeating as 1

I do miss regularly getting anarchostripperism’s posts in my feed while scrolling reddit in public

What is the bag you carry it in?

YEAH WASP DISCOURSE AGAIN WOOHOO

Those damn imperialists providing weapons to a sovereign country in order to protect itself from it’s imperialist neighbor trying to annex it!

All you fuckers are like “of course I’d pull the lever in a trolley problem, less people dying is more important than my active involvement”

But when it actually comes to it it’s suddenly “fuck that”

Some clients allow you to filter posts with specific words in the title, so you can filter out posts with heathcliff

Ik, I was trying (and failing) to make a joke

If you look at these big fucking honkers and your first thought is kids, you should maybe get that checked

Wow, driftloon’s fatphobic?

I think it’s related to the tumblr post about killing a geologist

Can we stop being intersectional? Can we stop doing other things? Can we stop caring about issues? Can we regress? Can we regress? Can we regress?

I feel like the vitriol also in large part comes from this. A lot of people know that it is unethical and wrong but in order to acknowledge that they would either have to change their behaviour radically or acknowledge that according to their own morals they are bad people. Most people can pretend that they don’t really have a choice or can’t really change, but when they meet someone who has made these radical changes, they get confronted with the reality and get instantly defensive in order to keep the illusion intact that they are “morally good”, taking out their own insecurity on the person that made the choice that they haven’t made.

Listen mate, I know you really don’t like to be challenged on the ethics of something that you really don’t want to change, but most of the replies here seem to be civil and pretty well-informed discussions. You knew that a lot of vegans and vegetarians would show up under a post about animals being gassed, you could have scrolled down if that made you uncomfortable, or written actual arguments for your current beliefs, but instead you decided to write replies that add nothing to the conversation, making you the insufferable twat.

Ps: yes, I know this is an insufferable reply. I’m sorry, I couldn’t help myself. Have a nice day!

If that’s your interpretation of this post, sure.

Afaik, we could produce food way more efficiently if we did not produce meat. Meat takes a lot of land, food, water and energy, because the animals use a lot of the energy they are fed in the form of crops just to live. That doesn’t all get converted to meat. In terms of pure energy, being vegan is way more efficient.

If it is a matter of survival, sure. But if it is a luxury, like it is for many of the people who consume the most?

It is toki pona