![](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/602bab2a-3284-4e6e-9ee9-342b4c025f72.webp)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/bae905b8-0357-4d8f-aeee-8c3227e76c8c.png)
8·
4 days agoThey have to have a lot more barrel strength though: If you look closely, the propellant charge is literally a nuke.
I’m a German trans woman (female pronouns) working as a post-doc in cryptography.
They have to have a lot more barrel strength though: If you look closely, the propellant charge is literally a nuke.
Anyone who thinks this was about getting AI working was the idiot from the start, there still isn’t even a real use-case for it. This was always about funneling huge amounts of money from the government budget to a bunch of rich assholes. The outcome doesn’t matter at all here.
The F22 in the image is about 7 diagonal pixels long, that is √2⋅7 pixels length. The ship in the picture is 1727 pixels long, which equates to an actual length of almost exactly 3300m.
As a bonus this allows us to calculate the barrel-diameter: At 14 pixels width, this indicates a 27m diameter or a barrel-strength of a bit over 12m. Not sure if that is enough to contain the nuclear explosion that is mean to be fired inside it…