This really is gold, thank you for sharing. “Not only would indiscriminate attacks on civilians be arguably immoral, she points out, they’d potentially invite other countries to do the same, or worse.”

Well, Chekhov fits well between Dostoyevsky and Saltykov-Shchedrin.

Can’t quite access the link, so here it is: the link

To be fair - Johnny Silverhand we meet is a heavily modified verison. Both memories, personality and (possibly) appearance are altered by someone, who may or may not be Yorinobu Arasaka.

Then there is base tabletop, creator of which (M. Pondsmith) is said to favour Nomads.

There are already good advices here - but I would like to suggest something that seems obvious, but might still be overlooked: consider several most likely questions your professor will ask, and prepare answers for them.

Alternatively, add “Original by” above / in front of the signature.

This is funny, because it is true. But also sad, for exact same reason.

Word (portmanteau) chosen to be denote “Soviets State” is also a derisive one, typically used by those hostile to it. (Perhaps not unlike CPC vs CCP nowadays)

Or, rather, shares a name with (est. 1856).

Comrades, please be nice to each other, and argue in good faith. Also please do not randomly downvote.

Frank Herbert vibes from the first paragraph.

С днём рождения!

Thank you for sharing this; have not actually finished reading just yet. Some “political” connecctions author makes do seem… Very particular. Search for “Marx”, “Lenin”, “Communism” in the document if you would like.

Actually after having done that myself, perhaps it does, in part, belong to TL;DR. Thankfully the author did account for that.

Gentlemen.