And in 5-10 years they won’t be able to forgive the Conservatives.
People like to think humanity is civilized, but the vast majority of voters are still using emotions rather than logic to decide their choice.
And in 5-10 years they won’t be able to forgive the Conservatives.
People like to think humanity is civilized, but the vast majority of voters are still using emotions rather than logic to decide their choice.
National Christians
NatC for short.
Well, the biggest problem with this situation and using the term “innocent” is that the vast majority of Gazans support Hamas and supported the attack on Oct 7th.
72% support for the attack.
I don’t consider those people innocent.
So they’re pretty much on target.
Life isn’t fair.
There isn’t some sort of right to fairness.
What’s the diplomatic solution? Give in to terrorists and let them attack again?
That’s exactly what happened in Ukraine with Crimea and we’ve all seen how that turned out.
These groups both want the same land. Somebody has to not get their way.
This is directly contradictory to other super obvious evidence. Like the fact that conservative states have much lower life expectancy.
I think there’s some tomfoolery with this study.
What a fucking click bait title.
When you attack someone stronger than you, it usually does not end well. They can try, but there will be further consequences.
It took a few hundred thousand middle eastern civilians dying after 9/11 before anyone started complaining and even that did not lead to this level of protest.
People are ok with violence if its their country that has been attacked.
Do I should let them take my family with no consequence because they’re using human shields?
No, my side is strong enough to get them back. Screw the terrorists and those that harbour them. They can try to retaliate, and they can die until they won’t fight back anymore.
People these days seem to think there’s a diplomatic solution for everything. They need to go read a nonfiction history book, because they are currently in the fiction section.
To me, if my children or wife had been taken hostage. There would be no limit to the ratio I would be willing to accept to get them back.
Hamas still has hostages captured that day they are tying to use for negotiations.
The difference between my opinion and yours is that you consider it incidental murder, while I consider it a war that Palestinians are losing. War kills people, and acceptable casualties (enemy, friendly, and even innocents) are literally part of the calculations made by every single country that has ever participated in a war.
Nah, we’re far too resourceful to be killed by climate change.
It may take out large chunks of the global population, but we will adapt with technology to be able to still sustain billions of humans.
Humans are social animals, you’re the odd one out here from a social perspective, not that you’re not entitled to that choice but choices have consequences.
I’d suggest just ignoring them. You aren’t going to find a better work environment anywhere else unless you literally have no coworkers.
Innocents don’t murder journalists…
Hamas killed four Israeli journalists on Oct 7th during the attacks.
“but Israel is doing it worse”
How many people are they allowed to kill in retaliation for Oct 7th? Zero? 1:1? 10:1?
No country in the world would get attacked and not retaliate if they had the means.
Still considered a laptop, they have low power modes for unplugged use.
The only problem I have with this is that USB-C PD can only go to 240w, which is fine for most laptops but my current gaming laptop has a 240w power brick and it only has a 3060 in it. The 3080 and 3090 variants had 300w+ bricks IIRC.
I don’t live in India, but I hope gaming laptops get some sort of exception if their power draw can exceed the specification limits.
“no proof of an illicit deal”
The money IS the proof of the illicit deal, they gave him money when there was no legal or reasonable reason to give him money.
“We wanted to just give away money” isn’t a legal reason for anyone who isn’t recording for a you tube channel at this point.
What do people hope to get out of watching an MMA fight?
Same answer here, they’re just looking for entertainment. They have a man they like in the ring, and they’re hoping he throws a few good punches at that other bad guy.
I’m not sure that’s going to hold true with so many people being effectively inflated into poverty.
It’s going to get worse, a lot worse.
Ye and no.
Good ideas, but also the retaliation tariffs are not planned to be on everything, the last time we saw this it was things like targeting Tennessee whisky and other specific luxury goods. While they would harm consumer choice, there are tons of alternatives in many of those categories from both Canada and elsewhere.