• cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right so we just implement socialist policies in housing.

    I mean, water, power, education, healthcare are all heavily regulated or controlled by the government. Why not housing? It is a basic human need after all more of a basic need than education (not saying education should change).

    • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      despite my socialist views I’m also a realist: no elected government in Canada or US would socialize real estate. None. Within current economic and political system it’s a surefire recipefor country implosion. The only feasible solution is taxing “luxury” properties and diverting that money towards subsidized/public housing. Demand outpaces supply and supply is being choked by corporations and individuals scooping up properties and not releasing them back either as rentals or for resale. Make it passable for them to sell and impossible to hold and we can bring market to some shaky equilibrium. Build more affordable housing and you may stabilize the market. There are no other options on the table as far as I know.

      • MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s my take as well here in Australia.

        No person should own more than one house, and no corporations can own a house ever.

        If you must move, that’s ok, there is a central no reserve auction system that you must place your property into.

        You can also buy your new property from said no reserve auction system.

        Making housing a wealth vehicle is immoral

    • 'M' as in 'MANCY'@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s sweet that you think we can just implement social policies like that.

      Only the rich and corporations would benefit from the housing market crashing.

      • cybermass@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, just tax corporate home ownership, double property tax for homes that sit empty for more than 3 or 6 months, and put a 50% tax on any rental net profits above 15% of the total rental price.

        Use that money for high density/low income development grants, seems simple to me.