Aww … poor little ISPs.

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The tax drives me crazy. The excuse for not displaying the total price after tax is because it’s different for each state. …yet the cash register seems to be able to handle that perfectly fine. So it can’t that hard to figure it out.

    Edit: after a quick look into it, the main problem is tax in a lot of places is based on the Total amount sold, not on each item. So that could definitely be impossible to display before hand.

    • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      after a quick look into it, the main problem is tax in a lot of places is based on the Total amount sold, not on each item.

      I’m actually confused, aren’t taxes a percentage? The sum of a percentage of all items should be the same as a percentage of the sum, no? Or is my brain not do math good? Can someone smarter than me explain?

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The sum of a percentage of all items should be the same as a percentage of the sum, no?

        Suppose you buy two items costing x and y, and there’s a constant sales tax of t (say 10%, or 0.1). You’d pay t * x + t * y, or t * (x + y). You can even generalize this to Σ(t * x) = t * Σx (for xX, where X is the set of prices you’re paying).

        In other words, yes.

        In case you want the math name for this property, it’s the distributive property.

        I think the issue they were bringing up though is that tax is not applied equally to all items, and that tax may be determined by number of items sold. I don’t actually know if this is true or not, but if it is, the distributive property doesn’t apply anymore. Edit: I re-read the comment, that doesn’t look like what they were saying actually. Either way, if tax is weird like this, distributive property may not apply anymore.

        • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Say you list a table lamp on your website at $100, tax included. Well, if you sell that table lamp to a buyer in Connecticut (where the tax rate is a flat 6.35%) then you’re required to remit $6.35 in sales tax to the state of Connecticut on that transaction.

          But if you sell the same table lamp to a buyer in Aberdeen, Washington, where the sales tax rate is 9.08%, then you’d be required to remit $9.08 in sales tax to the state of Washington.

          As you can see, you are cutting into your profit margin by including tax in your pricing.

          Further, US customers are accustomed to paying their local sales tax rates. We’re so accustomed to paying odd amounts in sales tax that paying a flat rate might surprise us or leave us a little confused.

          This is anti-consumer bullshit nonsense. All they did was hid their only real “con” behind a wall of text. “As you can see, you are cutting into your profit margin by including sales tax”

          And the last paragraph is fucking stupid too. People are too used to seeing numbers, so other numbers will confuse them!

    • ripcord@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m not aware of anywhere in the US where the tax is variable depending on total amount sold. Sometimes some things are excluded from sales tax. But that’s per-item and not variable.

      In the vast majority of the US there’s no reason they can’t just display the price with tax.

      Granted, prices on consumer items are so fucking out of control retailers and etc just charge whatever the fuck they want and people are expected to pay it. They’re gouging at 80%, 100%, 150% markups on food, clothing, services, etc versus 2 years ago and people seem to just accept it (tough not to when everyone is doing it)

      Initially they got away with it because “COVID supply problems”, which was frequently a lie or exaggeration. Now there’s no excuse given typically; people quote “inflation” but that’s a tiny fraction of it. It’s just gouging companies have learned they can keep getting away with more and more.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Check out the article linked below. I’m interested in what you think after that. Especially with the states that forbid including tax in displayed prices (and why they don’t).

        I didn’t know about that until I just read it.

    • christopherius@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      When I make price signs at work I make sure the price shows taxes and bottle deposits. I think my store is the only one to do that. I manage a liquor store