edited: to put entire article in body of post, instead of just beginning & end.
A law amendment in Iraq has proposed capital punishment for homosexual relationships. Campaigners have called it a “dangerous” escalation in the country where people already face frequent attacks and discrimination. However, life for queer Iraqis hasn’t always been this way. As with so many stains on worldwide human rights, the worsening homophobia and transphobia in Iraq can be traced back to the British empire.
Iraq: debating the death penalty for LGBTQ+ people
The amendment to a 1988 anti-prostitution law passed a first reading in parliament last week. It would enable courts to issue “the death penalty or life imprisonment” sentences for “homosexual relations”. This is according to a document seen by Agence France-Press (AFP). The amendment would also set a minimum seven-year prison term for “promoting homosexuality”.
Currently, no existing laws explicitly punish homosexual relations. However, the state has prosecuted LGBTQ+ people for sodomy, or under vague morality and anti-prostitution clauses in Iraq’s penal code. This also comes at a time when the state and the media are also cracking-down on open discussion about LGBTQ+ issues.
The national media and communications commission is considering banning Iraq-based publications from using the term “homosexuality”. Instead, it would advise media outlets to use the derogatory term “sexual deviance”. It also wants to ban the term “gender”.
‘Abnormal social phenomena’, apparently
The law change appears to have broad support in the Islamist-majority assembly. Saud al-Saadi is member of Shiite Muslim party Huquq, the political wing of the powerful Iran-aligned Hezbollah Brigades and part of the ruling coalition. He said the amendment was “still under discussion and subject to exchanges of viewpoints”. Saadi said a second reading had yet to be scheduled, and argued that parliament aims to “fill a legal vacuum”.
Lawmaker Sharif Suleiman of the Kurdistan Democratic Party said the proposed legislation reflects:
our moral and human values and our fights against abnormal social phenomena… We need deterrent laws.
‘My life will end’
A 2022 report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) and non-governmental organisation IraQueer found that people often target LGBTQ+ Iraqis with “kidnappings, rapes, torture and murders”. The state fails to punish the perpetrators. LGBTQ+ rights researcher at HRW Rasha Younes called the new proposed legislation as a “dangerous step”. She told AFP:
That means that Iraqi individuals’ life and constant fear of being hunted down and killed by armed groups with impunity is now going to translate into the law itself.
The Iraqi government (is) using the rights of LGBT people to distract the public from its lack of delivery.
The surge in anti-LGBTQ sentiment has stoked further fear among members of the community. Iraqi gay man Abdallah told AFP:
The situation has become too complicated because we are not protected by the authorities. If someone finds out that I’m gay and has a problem with me, they can send my name or photo to armed groups. My life will end.
It is likely Iraqi politicians will pass the law – and it can be directly linked back to Britain’s colonial influence.
Colonialism: bringing homophobia to Iraq and the Middle East
Historically, Iraq and other countries in the Middle East were not as homophobic as they are today. Rather, the Ottoman empire – part of which would later become present-day Iraq – was relatively permissive of homosexuality, particularly if it was kept out of the public eye.
Then, as History wrote:
Britain seized Iraq from Ottoman Turkey during World War I and was granted a mandate by the League of Nations to govern the nation in 1920. A Hashemite monarchy was organized under British protection in 1921, and on October 3, 1932, the kingdom of Iraq was granted independence.
But the damage was already done. The Economist explained that:
In 1885 the British government introduced new penal codes that punished all homosexual behaviour. Of the more than 70 countries that criminalise homosexual acts today, over half are former British colonies. France introduced similar laws around the same time. After independence, only Jordan and Bahrain did away with such penalties.
Britain forced its anti-LGBTQ+ laws onto Iraq (as it did most of its colonies). Negative societal attitudes and state criminalisation have remained ever since.
Now, it’s LGBTQ+ Iraqis feeling the full effects of the legacy of British colonialism.
Blaming Britain for a 150 year old law instead of a clearly bigoted and distinctively intolerant religion and theocracy is an insane take.
This is actually pants on head stupid.
the islam understander has logged on
Goddamn it’s like you libs never left 2003. “The issues in the middle east are due to Islam.” Just say you hate muslims dawg, I’m sure you’ll find plenty of liberals here who share your backwards views.
29 updoots
Redditors would never miss the chance to applaud “enlightened” racism
Yeah, there are a lot of things we can blame on imperialism/colonialism, but an independent country choosing to hate people for no reason is on them.
You want to say the original Yahtzee line so bad lmao
scratch a lib and a fascist bleeds example #2314209
I had to click through a few things to find out where this remarkable piece of journalism came from, figuring it must be a former colony with a chip on their shoulder.
Canary.co is a British publication lol
The truth is no one can hate us like we hate ourselves 😅
Truely nobody is as oppressed as straight cis pink brits.
deleted by creator
And it’s fully deserved![walking-dead walking-dead](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/e9ff7c81-aa8b-4c6b-aab5-2fdbf8788e2d.png)
good fuck the brits
Passing the blame of current laws onto British from 150 years ago is also inherently racist because it requires the current people of Iraq to be without free will. They are their own people and make their own decisions.
I guess they do and it’s called reddit
Can the Iraqi people make their own decisions or not?
TIL history doesn’t matter because we’re all self-contained individuals who make decisions free from the influence of any wider “society” (which doesn’t exist btw)
I thought Iraq was supposed to be a Free Democracy after the war, which was necessary because those pesky Iraqis couldn’t make the decision to overthrow Saddam even after 500,000 children died due to sanctions? Whatever happened with that![thinking-about-it thinking-about-it](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/e2f95486-0fe2-4d5b-8070-19e21bbc984e.png)