• xep@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Here’s the IAEA report: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/iaea_comprehensive_alps_report.pdf

    The discharge limit for tritium is pre-defined in the Government Policy for discharges of ALPS treated water as 22 TBq per year, which is equivalent to the pre-accident discharge limits at FDNPS.

    I’m also curious about how much discharge nuclear generators normally produce. If they discharge a certain amount as part of normal operation then it seems to me to also become a function of how many nuclear generators are being operated globally.

    • Bloops@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Hongyanhe reactor annually releases 4x as many becquerels of tritium. The Fukushima metldown released 5,000x as much. So this is obviously a non-issue being drummed up due to politics. 🙄

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hasn’t got anything to do with this release. Clearly radiative material was received during the accident. That will have made it into the food chain and some fish living near plant will have absorbed some.

        This release is about the gradual release of treated water which is measured to be below the existing limit.