dwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agoTrying to avoid antitrust suits, Google senior executives told employees to destroy internal messageswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1625arrow-down110
arrow-up1615arrow-down1external-linkTrying to avoid antitrust suits, Google senior executives told employees to destroy internal messageswww.nytimes.comdwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareBeej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoIt’s illegal if antitrust action is anticipated, according to the article. That said, I know that most places I’ve worked have had a document retention policy that called for automatic deletion of most documents after some time period, like a year.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·3 days ago It’s illegal if antitrust action is anticipated That seems like something that would be difficult to prove.
minus-squareBeej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoUnless they’ve received notification to that effect. “Hey, y’all, we’re considering anti-trust so save that shit.”
It’s illegal if antitrust action is anticipated, according to the article. That said, I know that most places I’ve worked have had a document retention policy that called for automatic deletion of most documents after some time period, like a year.
That seems like something that would be difficult to prove.
Unless they’ve received notification to that effect. “Hey, y’all, we’re considering anti-trust so save that shit.”