• can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The review goes over some of the methodology.

    and believe it on pure subjective opinion.

    I’m not saying that.

    Edit: if you’re saying it’s based on nothing then I expect you to have looked into it, yes

    • reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why should I, as the person receiving a meme, research why it is based on fact and not fiction?

      That’s not how the burden of proof works.

        • reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Any media with years, density, “shifting baseline syndrome” is not a meme, it’s an infograph disguised as a meme.

          So yes, your “meme” requires proof. And you’re a propagandist idiot if you think otherwise.

          • 257m@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            There is no secret agenda here. Its just a dumb meme. You can a meme with the words “shifting baseline syndrome” if you want. In fact you can put whatever you want in a meme.

      • 257m@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because you asked for it? Someone posted a dumb meme and didn’t cite it with studies and now you are mad. You do have some burden since you are the one who started the discussion on proof in the first place. If you can’t even be bothered to look at the proof they bring, its not their problem.