The two progressive lawmakers have addressed massive crowds in solidly red states including Idaho and Utah in recent days, as party of the national Fighting Oligarchy Tour.

A survey taken by Harvard’s Center for American Political Studies and Harris between April 9-10 found that 72% of Democratic voters supported politicians like Sanders (I-Vt.) and Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), “who are calling on Democrats to adopt a more aggressive stance towards Trump and his administration and ‘fight harder’,” rather than leaders who are willing to “compromise” with President Donald Trump.

  • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    Bernie can’t be the nominee because if he were to win and subsequently fail and not deliver - exactly what the democrats want and would ensure - they could not march him out to smother the anger again in the next election cycle.

    For what purpose, because when they do this they lose anyway.

    Your reasoning is just, “they can’t risk losing after they win, so they’re just going to lose in the first place instead”. “Democrats can’t risk losing their losing strategy”. Your reasoning is nonsensical.

    Did you not realize that she actually doesn’t answer question but talks gobbledygook around them?

    Kamala is very articulate and laid out some very specific details of plans. She pivoted to “politically correct” when it came to culturally contentious topics like trans rights, which I don’t love, but at least Walz stood on business on trans rights.

    To say Kamala spoke “gobbledygook” is objectively false, right wing propoganda.

    You verbatim speak like a right wing troll hyped up on low effort propoganda spreading horizontal hostility.

          • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            You’re not paying attention to Bernie’s fighting the oligarchy tour or facts.

            One of his points on the tour is arguing for an increased minimum wage. Bernie does the opposite of ignoring it.

            @lemming: You’re the one with egg on their face in this conversation right now.

              • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                The comments you directly ignored were specific to minimum wage.

                Do you think a country doesn’t have a right to self defense?

                Where’s the country you’re in, guessing they don’t deserve sovereignty either?

                That’s a very real conclusion that could be drawn from your statement.

                You’re still covered in schmutz, by smearing the dirty eggs in your face.

                You’re still ignoring the facts, and trying to push buttons.

                There’s no point with a goalpost moving liar.

          • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            Because your question spam was just a distraction from the original point that "you said something very stupid and nonsensical*, and I called you out on it. Rather than accept any kind of accountability for yourself, you made a desperate bid to take the conversation literally anywhere else.

            You aren’t a real person, 100% of your Lemmy comment history is “I hate Democrats and Bernie” political brainrot trolling. Real people have human personalities and hobbies. You’re an empty shell.