scratch a Musk-stan and you’ll likely find a Weeb who is also a MAGAt.
So your argument is that weebs are musk stans/MAGAts?
If not, what point are you trying to make? Because a weeb may be a musk stan/MAGAt, but let’s not target weebs just because some of them are shitheads.
These aren’t exclusive.
But your argument assumes the relationship goes both ways, which isn’t even close to true. An individual weeb may be a MAGAt, but all weebs aren’t.
So your argument pretty much falls apart, unless you’re just going after weebs for personal reasons.
I would say let’s compare that to the MAGAts and see who has more, but MAGAts can get pardoned by Donvict #47, so it’s not a fair comparison.
Agent 47.
I mean, scratch a Musk-stan and you’ll likely find a Weeb who is also a MAGAt. These aren’t exclusive.
So your argument is that weebs are musk stans/MAGAts?
If not, what point are you trying to make? Because a weeb may be a musk stan/MAGAt, but let’s not target weebs just because some of them are shitheads.
But your argument assumes the relationship goes both ways, which isn’t even close to true. An individual weeb may be a MAGAt, but all weebs aren’t.
So your argument pretty much falls apart, unless you’re just going after weebs for personal reasons.
My argument is that Musk stans are often Weebs and MAGAts.
I assumed that was your actual argument, hence the prebuttal
Trying to make this claim without looking at Grimes’s followers standard-issue posts is very funny.