Energy in physics feels analogous to money in economics. Is a manmade medium of exchange used for convenience. It is the exchange medium between measureable physical states/things.

Is energy is real in the same way money is? An incredibly useful accounting trick that is used so frequently it feels fundamental, but really it’s just a mathmatical convenience?

Small aside: From this perspective ‘conservatipn of energy’ is a redundant statement. Of course energy must be conserved or else the equations are wrong. The definition of energy is it’s conservation.

  • dnick@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well, technically the ‘now’ experiment only works one time. Of you exclude time as an assumption there isn’t another location to place previous or subsequent results.

    • kalkulat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Isn’t another location

      “previous” and “subsequent” locations in space are memory phenomena, High-energy location changes are closer together in memory. Our “time” is a bookshelf of physical events in space, one following another. Of course they’re sequential, so it was convenient to ‘measure’ the ‘distance’ between the books for purposes of prediction. But we’ve invented that ruler, then forgot we made it up. Many indigenous people have no ‘time’, and they manage.