• ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Holy shit this is huge. I can finally use obsidian at work! I was avoiding it due to the license and using Logseq. Which, to be fair, did admirably. But it’s much more and Outliner or journaling system than a knowledge base I feel.

    • Uriel_Copy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Me too! I’ve been having a blast with it today. It’s so much more fluid and intuitive. I already have Syncthing set up everywhere (for Logseq) so there’s been almost no friction at all.

      I’m unreasonably happy about this

    • prinzmegahertz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can you elaborate on this? I use logseq as an information dump and use tags and hashtags to associate the individual entries with a certain topic. I love that i do not have to think about the file structure (where do i have to put it?) and instead can just write it down immediately.

      E.g: had a meeting with #name with regards to #project Z. We have a set of new requirements that need to be implemented in by Q3 2025….

      Would this be significantly different in obsidian?

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        With Obsidian, you don’t have to use folders. I’m generally of the opinion that having a tool is better than not having access to it. Tags and Folders are just an option to use. Fundamentally Logseq and Obsidian otherwise can be very similar.

      • artificialfish@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah Logseq is actually a much better knowledge management tool than obsidian. It’s literally built for that, whereas obsidian requires you to force structure onto it.