Some farms that feed cows in yards already use food additives that help reduce methane production in a cow’s stomach, but they have downsides, such as variable efficacy and the need to be constantly supplied, which is difficult if the animals are free to roam.
A vaccine could be an alternative, and the Pirbright Institute in the UK, a virology lab focusing on livestock, is leading a three-year study to develop one. “The appeal of a vaccine as part of the solution is that it’s a very well adopted, common practice, with infrastructure able to do this already, and people know about the benefits of vaccination for animal health generally,” says John Hammond, director of research at The Pirbright Institute.
The methane released from cows is only one facet of their negative environmental impact associated with upscaled meat production.
Yeah this is just the meat/dairy industry version of what the electric car is to the car industry
It’s insane how beef consumption never gets mentioned for global warming. Somehow straws got more attention than factory farmed beef. The straw problem solution was worse than the symptom. This planet is cooked literally and figuratively.
The straw thing was a manufactured distraction.
People are just big emotional children, and if you suggest they shouldn’t eat so many burgers they don’t evaluate the facts, pros, and cons. They have a feeling and then blame you. And probably go on about how vegans suck.
I’m not a vegan but I try to eat less meat because come on.
“Lalalala! I can’t hear you with my hands over my ears and me talking about straws so loudly!”
Cognitive dissonance is a helluva drug.
I recently had an exchange where the other person was trying to argue that meat consumption had nothing to do with production because production occures before consumption. I was talking to them for like a day but uh yeah. at that point I blocked them.
To an extent they’re right but probably not in the way they intended to be. Government subsidies help ensure that animal ag can be profitable and incentivized regardless of consumption levels, and the ever-expanding amounts of land required for most animal ag and it’s support infrastructure (eg feedstock production, a byproduct of industrial soy oil) literal fuel and are fueled by imperial expansion in a cyclic self-reinforcing fashion. If people stopped eating beef today without also protesting it’s existence you’d probably see the animal ag industry continue to run on it’s own fumes for years.
Yeah, to a certain extent that’s true, but it’s also the demand that creates the subsidies in the first place.
If all demand were to suddenly disappear (it won’t), you’re absolutely right, production would tend towards lingering on for quite a while. The best option in that sort of case would be for the producers to get paid to not produce. Governments shouldn’t punish people for not being able to forsee every circumstance.
But that scenario is unrealistic. Transitions take time, and existing systems will have time to respond accordingly.
subsidies are one thing but I don’t think its enough if it has to be thrown striaght into the trash.