• 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    another great example is satisfactory. it was in early access for a long time and the result is amazing.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      It was on Epic Games before that too, but it is still incredibly rough around the edges, even after launch. From listening to the dev logs, it seems they made a lot systems quickly initially and then out grew them and spent a lot of time rewriting poor code, there was quite a bit of mismanagement with Satisfactory.

      • 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        idk, have you played it? I have well over 1000 hours in it and it was worth every cent I spent from the day I bought it. even if they never added any updates after update 6 I would’ve been satisfied. but they didn’t, they added so much more stuff and the 1.0 release was huge and really fucking awesome. I don’t care about the dev logs or what their code quality is, the game is and was great and that’s what I paid for.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes, I have over 500 hours myself and I am playing it right now aha.

          I would recommend the game and it is worth the money. That doesn’t mean I am going to pretend it is perfect and without issues. I am constantly wrestling with things in game, crashing and running into bugs.

          I am also way more critical of games I like, because I want them to be just that bit better.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The exact one I was thinking of

      Valheim is another great example, though it’s still probably a year out from release