• Bleys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Lukewarm take: mods had valid grievances, but were dumb as fuck to unilaterally make a major decision without even consulting the community beforehand, which is definitely worse imo.

    It reminds me of so many subreddits where overactive mods decide they know what’s best for their subreddit and impose rules that would never pass a basic yes/no poll, demonstrating they don’t actually care about the community. Mods are supposed to be janitors (not an insult, just statement of fact), but too often act with the presumed arrogance of “leaders”.

    Edit to add: this is what the mods should have done:

    1. Make a stickied thread with examples of users being banned or comments being removed unjustly
    2. Ask users if the above justifies moving to a new host, and if so ask which one

    It’s that simple

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      …impose rules that would never pass a basic yes/no poll…

      I generally agree with your comment, but I wanted to point out that the tyranny of the majority can still be a major issue. For example, there are often times when a majority of people believe the opposite of what a small number of experts agree is the best course of action. You can see this in laws that suppress trans rights receiving wider public support, even when they go against medical best practices.